For this round of the crypto market to truly pick up, retail investors actually have little say. Look at the gold market, which is ten times the size of Bitcoin; in the end, it's still institutional funds that call the shots. Bitcoin can't escape this logic either.



But there's a bigger issue here—quantum computing. This is the most dangerous hurdle Bitcoin has to face.

Speaking of this, there's a fanatic who has been accumulating Bitcoin and has previously discussed the quantum threat. In December 2025, he shared a view that quantum computing is coming, and Bitcoin won't crash; instead, it will upgrade. Sounds new, let's break it down: after the network upgrade, coins owned by users will be transferred to new secure addresses, and those unclaimed "lost coins" will be frozen in place.

The clever part is this—the overall network security level increases, but the actual circulating coins decrease. What does a reduction in circulation mean? Greater scarcity.

The current situation is quite realistic: Bitcoin held by retail investors is decreasing, while institutional holdings are piling up. Their goal is to maximize profits. For most retail investors, the risk of quantum computing is very distant—similar to worrying about Earth being destroyed one day—it's just a feeling, but it's not something you need to worry about right now.
BTC3,25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DaoResearchervip
· 9h ago
According to the economic model analysis in the white paper, this set of arguments contains a fatal flaw of incentive incompatibility. The forced migration mechanism under quantum threats is essentially an invisible plunder on token holders—losing coins and freezing them may sound elegant, but in reality, it is inflation redistribution, which from a tokenomics perspective makes no sense.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 9h ago
Wow, this logic is pretty clever. Losing coins and freezing them actually increases scarcity. The institutions are playing this game very skillfully.
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrainvip
· 9h ago
Retail investors' anxiety has struck again. Why the rush with Quantum stuff? Institutions eat the meat, we drink the soup—that's the norm. The real scarcity game has just begun. But this logic is a bit tricky—lost coins frozen = de facto deflation? Sounds pretty appealing. Quantum threats are still far off; it's better to study how institutions will cut leeks next year.
View OriginalReply0
Degentlemanvip
· 9h ago
Institutions are playing chess, while we are watching the game. Retail investors really don't have a say.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)