Quantum computing is changing the game. By 2026, this once sci-fi concept is becoming increasingly real, and the threat it poses to the multi-trillion-dollar Bitcoin network is also becoming more apparent.
Let's look at the data: over one-third of Bitcoin addresses are exposed to potential quantum attack risks. A certain quantum protection team has even launched an emergency protection testnet, claiming it is the last bastion against quantum threats. The question is—is this a real technical challenge or just another tactic to create panic and manipulate retail investors?
The technical principle is actually straightforward: Bitcoin's security foundation is based on RSA and elliptic curve cryptography, which are very secure in traditional computing environments. But once quantum computers mature, they can crack these encryption systems at an exponential speed. More specifically, they can derive private keys from public keys—any old wallet that has exposed its public key could be compromised. This is not just theoretical; a certain protection team's testnet has already demonstrated that quantum attacks can target Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism.
What does this mean? The entire network's consensus mechanism might need to be re-evaluated. Global cybersecurity research institutions have already listed quantum attacks as one of the top threats, especially in the context of AI acceleration. The progress of quantum technology is expected to be faster than many anticipate.
But think calmly: before the real threat arrives, the community, developers, and exchanges will have already taken action. Segregated Witness (SegWit), multi-signature schemes, post-quantum cryptography research—these defenses are already underway. Bitcoin's inherent resilience is part of its strength. So rather than panic, it’s better to focus on how this technological arms race will evolve.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMelonWatcher
· 7h ago
Back with this set again? Quantum threats, the last fortress... sounds just like the prelude to a pump-and-dump scheme
Honestly, Bitcoin has been around for over ten years, and these defenses have long been in place. Why panic now?
One-third of addresses exposed risk sounds scary, but it would take ages to actually do something about it
Let’s see if it’s a real technical challenge or just another attempt to scam my money...
Reversing private keys sounds impressive, but developers are not to be underestimated
Quantum stuff is just a topic; everyone wants to jump on the bandwagon and make a quick buck
Instead of listening to their threats, why not ask ordinary coin holders if they really want to do anything?
Multi-signature and SegWit have been around for a while, so why are we only talking about a quantum crisis now?
Basically, it’s just looking for new reasons to create anxiety
The defenses are already in place, so just wait and see. No need to panic right now
When quantum arrives, we’ll talk about it. For now, just focus on watching your wallets carefully
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 7h ago
Here comes the story of cutting leeks again. As soon as the protection testnet goes live, someone is already selling courses and coins. Honestly, quantum threats do exist, but this pace feels too much like marketing.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 7h ago
Is it the same old quantum panic again? Every time they say it's going to be the end, but what actually happens?
Honestly, I've seen this kind of news several rounds. Launching protection tests = a prelude to cutting leeks? I think that's a bit far-fetched.
But to be fair, isolation witnesses and multi-signatures are indeed in use, and they're not some black technology. The Bitcoin system itself is resilient enough.
When quantum comes, there's not much we can do. Early research into quantum-resistant cryptography will do the trick.
Instead of worrying about 2026 blindly, it's better to see whose defense plan is the most reliable and first to be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartender
· 7h ago
It's the same old quantum story, every year someone yells wolf haha
It's both quantum and 1/3 exposure, what's the deal with new "last bastions" every month?
We've been talking about quantum threats for three years, why are we still stuck in the same place now?
Launching the protection testnet = project team wants to cut the leeks, this logic is basically a sure thing
The proof of stake has been around for a long time, multi-signatures are not new, why panic now?
How long until quantum computers are mature? I bet this will be slower than ETH2.0, haha
With this level of risk, I wouldn't even move my old coins elsewhere
Quantum computing is changing the game. By 2026, this once sci-fi concept is becoming increasingly real, and the threat it poses to the multi-trillion-dollar Bitcoin network is also becoming more apparent.
Let's look at the data: over one-third of Bitcoin addresses are exposed to potential quantum attack risks. A certain quantum protection team has even launched an emergency protection testnet, claiming it is the last bastion against quantum threats. The question is—is this a real technical challenge or just another tactic to create panic and manipulate retail investors?
The technical principle is actually straightforward: Bitcoin's security foundation is based on RSA and elliptic curve cryptography, which are very secure in traditional computing environments. But once quantum computers mature, they can crack these encryption systems at an exponential speed. More specifically, they can derive private keys from public keys—any old wallet that has exposed its public key could be compromised. This is not just theoretical; a certain protection team's testnet has already demonstrated that quantum attacks can target Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism.
What does this mean? The entire network's consensus mechanism might need to be re-evaluated. Global cybersecurity research institutions have already listed quantum attacks as one of the top threats, especially in the context of AI acceleration. The progress of quantum technology is expected to be faster than many anticipate.
But think calmly: before the real threat arrives, the community, developers, and exchanges will have already taken action. Segregated Witness (SegWit), multi-signature schemes, post-quantum cryptography research—these defenses are already underway. Bitcoin's inherent resilience is part of its strength. So rather than panic, it’s better to focus on how this technological arms race will evolve.