Over the past two years, the cryptocurrency market has been driven by the booming options trading, but this situation is changing. According to the latest analysis, the influence of options on Bitcoin and Ethereum prices has significantly weakened, reflecting a market shift from aggressive leverage to cautious positioning. This is not just a marginalization of trading tools but an important signal of market structure adjustment.
Significant Decline in Options Exposure, Continued Diminishing Influence
Key moments in data changes
Asset
Peak Exposure Time
Peak Exposure Size
Current Status
Bitcoin
October 2025
About $52 billion
About $28 billion
Ethereum
August 2025
Not disclosed
Sharp decline
From this data, it’s clear that Bitcoin options exposure has shrunk by nearly 46% in less than three months. This is not a minor adjustment but a sign that market participants are actively withdrawing leverage positions.
The impact of options on spot prices is waning
In the past two years, increased activity in options trading was a key driver of market momentum. But now, this logic has reversed—options’ influence on spot price volatility has noticeably weakened. What does this mean? Simply put, the market no longer relies heavily on options to create price movements.
Market Structure Is Quietly Changing
Slowing capital inflows and more cautious allocations
Behind the decline in options exposure, it reflects that some funds are significantly slowing their short-term entry pace. New positions are also becoming more selective—no longer buying indiscriminately but choosing carefully.
This shift manifests in several ways:
Continued deleveraging, with market participants actively reducing risk exposure
Traders still buying call options to express bullish expectations, but both scale and enthusiasm are waning
The overall market shifting from “aggressive leverage” to “cautious positioning”
Divergence in Bitcoin and Ethereum holdings structure
Here’s an interesting phenomenon. In Bitcoin’s options market, traders are still expressing optimism by buying calls. But Ethereum is different—the classic “long futures combined with put options for hedging” setup is gradually unwinding.
What does this divergence indicate? It suggests that market expectations for these two assets are starting to diverge, with Ethereum holders becoming more aggressive in de-leveraging.
The Other Side of Market Sentiment
According to the latest market analysis, current crypto market sentiment is gradually stabilizing. The “Greed and Fear Index” is showing signs of bottoming out, which often occurs near Bitcoin’s cyclical lows. This echoes the decline in options exposure—markets are recovering from panic but have not entered a new cycle of aggressive leverage.
In other words, the market is repairing rather than surging.
Possible Future Trends
Based on these changes, some reasonable inferences are:
First, the options market is unlikely to become the dominant driver of market trends again in the foreseeable future. Participants have learned the lessons of deleveraging and will be more cautious.
Second, the market logic for 2026 may shift from “one-way bullish” to “range trading.” This means more oscillation and correction rather than a continuous surge. For traders, high buy-low-sell strategies will be more effective than holding through volatility blindly.
Finally, Bitcoin and Ethereum may show greater divergence in future performance. Bitcoin still has some bullish sentiment support, but Ethereum’s deleveraging could be more thorough.
Summary
Options have shifted from being a key market driver to a marginalized tool, and this transformation reflects a structural adjustment in the market. The reduction of exposure from $52 billion to $28 billion is not just a numerical change but a recalibration of risk appetite among market participants.
The key features of the current market are: stabilizing sentiment but not optimistic, ongoing deleveraging, and more cautious capital inflows. This suggests that upcoming market movements are more likely to be slow recoveries rather than rapid surges, with more opportunities for swing trading than for a unidirectional trend. For holders, maintaining discipline and flexibility will be more important than blind optimism.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Options lose momentum, $52 billion exposure shrinks: a deep signal of market deleveraging
Over the past two years, the cryptocurrency market has been driven by the booming options trading, but this situation is changing. According to the latest analysis, the influence of options on Bitcoin and Ethereum prices has significantly weakened, reflecting a market shift from aggressive leverage to cautious positioning. This is not just a marginalization of trading tools but an important signal of market structure adjustment.
Significant Decline in Options Exposure, Continued Diminishing Influence
Key moments in data changes
From this data, it’s clear that Bitcoin options exposure has shrunk by nearly 46% in less than three months. This is not a minor adjustment but a sign that market participants are actively withdrawing leverage positions.
The impact of options on spot prices is waning
In the past two years, increased activity in options trading was a key driver of market momentum. But now, this logic has reversed—options’ influence on spot price volatility has noticeably weakened. What does this mean? Simply put, the market no longer relies heavily on options to create price movements.
Market Structure Is Quietly Changing
Slowing capital inflows and more cautious allocations
Behind the decline in options exposure, it reflects that some funds are significantly slowing their short-term entry pace. New positions are also becoming more selective—no longer buying indiscriminately but choosing carefully.
This shift manifests in several ways:
Divergence in Bitcoin and Ethereum holdings structure
Here’s an interesting phenomenon. In Bitcoin’s options market, traders are still expressing optimism by buying calls. But Ethereum is different—the classic “long futures combined with put options for hedging” setup is gradually unwinding.
What does this divergence indicate? It suggests that market expectations for these two assets are starting to diverge, with Ethereum holders becoming more aggressive in de-leveraging.
The Other Side of Market Sentiment
According to the latest market analysis, current crypto market sentiment is gradually stabilizing. The “Greed and Fear Index” is showing signs of bottoming out, which often occurs near Bitcoin’s cyclical lows. This echoes the decline in options exposure—markets are recovering from panic but have not entered a new cycle of aggressive leverage.
In other words, the market is repairing rather than surging.
Possible Future Trends
Based on these changes, some reasonable inferences are:
First, the options market is unlikely to become the dominant driver of market trends again in the foreseeable future. Participants have learned the lessons of deleveraging and will be more cautious.
Second, the market logic for 2026 may shift from “one-way bullish” to “range trading.” This means more oscillation and correction rather than a continuous surge. For traders, high buy-low-sell strategies will be more effective than holding through volatility blindly.
Finally, Bitcoin and Ethereum may show greater divergence in future performance. Bitcoin still has some bullish sentiment support, but Ethereum’s deleveraging could be more thorough.
Summary
Options have shifted from being a key market driver to a marginalized tool, and this transformation reflects a structural adjustment in the market. The reduction of exposure from $52 billion to $28 billion is not just a numerical change but a recalibration of risk appetite among market participants.
The key features of the current market are: stabilizing sentiment but not optimistic, ongoing deleveraging, and more cautious capital inflows. This suggests that upcoming market movements are more likely to be slow recoveries rather than rapid surges, with more opportunities for swing trading than for a unidirectional trend. For holders, maintaining discipline and flexibility will be more important than blind optimism.