2026-01-14 06:26:27

This project indeed has a poor history and has gone through multiple name changes. But from a different perspective—obtaining tens of millions of dollars in funding from a leading exchange, plus having the exchange's负责人 serve as an advisor—things look completely different.

It is rare to see top-tier exchanges allocate this level of funds to support a single project, and advisory positions are even more scarce resources. This indicates that someone behind the scenes recognizes its development potential. Of course, this does not rule out the possibility that some project teams deliberately craft a storyline for fundraising purposes. However, from market signals, this kind of large-scale financing combined with high-level advisors usually indicates that the capital party has long-term confidence. What the project team needs to do is to turn this expectation into tangible product iterations and ecosystem development.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanKing

· 01-14 06:55

Tens of millions in funding + senior exchange advisors, this combination definitely has some potential Can the black history of multiple name changes be whitewashed? Let's see the follow-up actions No matter how beautiful the storyline is, in the end, it still depends on whether the product can deliver

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit

· 01-14 06:54

Changing names multiple times is indeed hard to believe. But raising tens of millions in funding? That's a different story. Wait, is this for real? Senior executives from the exchange personally advising? That’s a sign of something. No matter how fancy the storyline is, it has to land. Let’s just wait and see the product. Spending so much on funding, if it ends in failure, that’s just too much. Take a gamble? A poor history doesn’t necessarily mean a poor future; it all depends on how they proceed. The risk of renaming is indeed high, but big capital bets usually have vision. Advisor positions are indeed rare, but it could also just be for reputation. Let’s see what happens next. A slogan alone is useless; in the end, it’s about product iteration. Pouring hundreds of millions in, with no way back, I believe in this.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-5854de8b

· 01-14 06:50

The scale of this funding indeed depends, but after so many name changes, it's still a bit uncertain. Exchanges spending so much money... Are they genuinely optimistic or just storytelling? To be honest, raising funds is easy now; the real test is whether it can be implemented. I've seen quite a few projects like this, but only a few survive in the end. The key still depends on whether they can fulfill their promises later on. What’s the use of just raising funds? Big names backing it up are one thing, but ultimately, the product has to speak for itself.

View OriginalReply0

staking_gramps

· 01-14 06:30

Having changed the name several times and still able to raise this level of funding shows that some people really believe in it. However, it still depends on whether they can deliver in the future.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaBrain