2026-01-14 05:29:33

I've been studying the logic of shorting contracts recently and discovered an interesting phenomenon—using the magnitude of the increase to determine the timing for adding positions works quite well. In simple terms, it's like applying a Martingale approach, turning each rebound into an opportunity to establish a short position.

Honestly, these kinds of contract assets are not very interesting when they rise; basically, each upward wave seems to be paving the way for the subsequent decline. 😑

That said, this position might still be a bit early. After all, from a doubling perspective, the increase hasn't reached the ideal entry point for shorts.

Sharing that I am currently testing this approach on a demo account. Once enough data is accumulated, I will consider live trading.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenomicsShaman

· 12h ago

Martingale adding positions sounds simple, but in actual operation, those who get liquidated are probably playing like this, right? --- Wait, you said the price hasn't even reached the increase yet and you're already shorting? That logic is a bit backwards. --- Can we look at the data from the demo account? Anyway, real trading is a different story. --- This is how futures work. The more you think there's a pattern, the easier you get slapped in the face. Be careful. --- It's interesting, but just a rebound could blow up your position. Why are you so calm about this? --- Shorting and waiting for a double to re-enter? Bro, are you gambling or trading?

View OriginalReply0

LoneValidator

· 15h ago

Martingale strategies really need repeated verification. You should only go in after simulating and confirming the data. It's indeed early; this rebound hasn't reached an ideal shorting point. Better to be patient and wait. Shorting tests your mental resilience the most; it's the hardest during upward moves. Run the simulations first, don't rush to lose real money. What's the point of watching the price rise every day? It's better to wait until the rebound ends before taking action. This logic sounds plausible, but risk control is the key.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 15h ago

Martingale strategies sound ideal in theory, but in practice, many people end up losing money. Simulation account data looks good, but it doesn't mean real money can withstand the test. Better to be cautious. With contracts, whether prices go up or down, some people still suffer heavy losses. But your approach is indeed somewhat interesting. Wait a bit before taking action. Don't rush this wave; there will be more opportunities anyway. The logic is clear, but it really depends on whether your psychological resilience can handle it.

View OriginalReply0

Web3Educator

· 15h ago

martingale on futures is lowkey just catching falling knives with extra steps, ngl

Reply0

GasGuru

· 15h ago

Martingale with a short position? Man, that's a bold idea. It sounds great to build a position during a rebound, but what about when you actually place the order? Wait, you said the doubling hasn't happened yet? Then it's actually early to enter now. No need to rush; wait until the data is fully accumulated before taking action. Simulate the process first and then go live. That's a good attitude. Don't be like a bunch of people who go all-in right away.

View OriginalReply0