The charm of DeFi lies in transparency, but this transparency has also become a nightmare for institutional finance.



Imagine: you are a trader at an asset management firm, and every loan, liquidity provision, and even the entire asset allocation is publicly available across the network. Your opponents can see where you add positions, predict when you might get liquidated, and manipulate the market accordingly. In such an environment, how can traditional finance dare to enter on a large scale?

This is precisely the key bottleneck that has long prevented DeFi from breaking into mainstream adoption. Blockchain’s transparency indeed attracts early retail users and developers, but for institutions managing billions of dollars in assets, this "full disclosure" is like exposing all tactics in front of the enemy. Risk management positions are exposed, trading strategies can be copied, and fund flows can be targeted—these are real vulnerabilities for market manipulation.

Some projects are beginning to recognize this issue. Take Dusk Network as an example; it is building the underlying infrastructure for an "institutional-grade DeFi," and the solution boils down to one word: privacy-first.

How exactly does it work? The core is zero-knowledge proof cryptography tools. Liquidity providers can stake and provide liquidity on Dusk without revealing specific asset sizes and compositions. They only need to use ZK proofs to demonstrate they have sufficient funds, without disclosing the actual numbers. This approach protects commercial secrets while ensuring protocol security.

The same logic applies to lending protocols. Suppose you are a borrower; your collateral details are supposed to be public, but lenders need to know whether you might be liquidated. Dusk’s solution is: use ZK proofs to verify that your liquidation threshold is safe, without exposing all collateral details. This prevents targeted attacks on your collateral and ensures fair market execution.

But this is not the most imaginative part.

Dusk supports the creation of "permissioned" or "consortium" application chains. Imagine financial giants like Morgan Stanley or Goldman Sachs building a private DeFi market accessible only to member institutions based on Dusk’s technology. In this market, institutions can conduct large-scale OTC derivatives trading, repo transactions, and settle complex structured products.

Most importantly: transactions are private—they are invisible externally—but the encrypted summaries of all transaction activities are synchronized to the Dusk mainnet. What does this mean? It means that while transaction details remain confidential, settlement certainty and auditability are guaranteed. There’s no room for black-box operations, but it also doesn’t expose tactics due to full transparency.

This is like a "safe transition zone" from private/consortium chains to a more open public chain ecosystem. Traditional finance doesn’t need to jump directly into fully open DeFi; they can first test the waters in this intermediate space and gradually adapt to encrypted financial logic.

Dusk’s true value is not to overthrow existing DeFi but to solve the core barriers faced by institutionalization and open up a brand new market. The trillions of dollars in traditional finance that are still on the sidelines have been waiting for such an infrastructure—one that offers both privacy and transparent verification.

Essentially, Dusk is building a trust bridge between TradFi and DeFi. It recognizes that markets need privacy and also require compliance verification. This is a more realistic and more easily accepted path for institutions than simply pursuing "complete transparency."
DUSK2,09%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BloodInStreetsvip
· 5h ago
Oh, so this is the real dilemma of traditional finance. Full transparency is like pulling down your pants and exposing yourself in front of everyone. How dare institutions play around with that? To put it simply, DeFi has been self-castrating all along. For the sake of that so-called idealistic transparency, it’s deliberately keeping potential trillion-dollar funds outside the door. Dusk’s approach is indeed innovative—finding a middle ground between privacy and verification. Finally, someone has thought of this. But I’m still a bit skeptical. Will institutions really trust this system, or is it just another new concept to harvest retail investors’ money? Seeing your positions means you can be targeted, and this can’t be prevented on-chain unless you can truly be invisible. Is a trillion-dollar fund watching this? I think it’s probably waiting for the next crash to buy the dip. Those who follow now are just riding the coattails. Here’s a question: if privacy is well implemented, how do you ensure audits? It still comes back to trusting some intermediary. For institutions, the most critical factor isn’t privacy; it’s stable expected returns and risk management. ZK proofs can’t change that.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggarvip
· 14h ago
That's right, being completely transparent is indeed not suitable for large funds. Wait, Dusk's privacy + auditability system feels a bit like trying to have it both ways? When institutions come in, the money will move accordingly, and that's the key point. ZK proofs sound great in theory, but I wonder if they will actually perform as smoothly as advertised in practice. Private DeFi markets? To be honest, they still need to operate on public blockchains, so where does the trust come from? Will the traditional finance folks really move? It still depends on who dares to take the first step.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCatvip
· 15h ago
Wow, finally someone hits the nail on the head. Transparency is heaven for retail investors but hell for institutions. I need to ponder the logic behind ZK proofs; it feels a bit like playing "I have money but not telling you how much" game. If Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley really build a private market on Dusk, the traditional finance world might really change forever. The balance between privacy and transparency sounds like a stepping stone for TradFi to get off the boat, preventing them from jumping straight into the deep waters of the crypto world. I feel this is the real key for DeFi to break out of its niche — not to overthrow anyone, but to make the big players willing to dive in.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidatorvip
· 15h ago
This idea is quite interesting. The balance between privacy and transparency is indeed a pain point. --- Exactly, the TradFi crowd is just afraid of being fully exposed. ZK proofs seem like a good solution to me. --- Wait, if that's the case, is a private transaction blockchain still called a chain? It feels like we're back to a black box. --- Haha, finally someone is going to be a middleman for TradFi. The market has been waiting for this breakthrough. --- I think Dusk's logic can survive; it meets institutional requirements for meticulousness while maintaining on-chain verifiability. --- The problem is, would Goldman Sachs really trust a small public chain? Trustworthiness still seems insufficient. --- Basically, it's about money. Wrapping privacy in a veneer, but essentially opening a backdoor for TradFi. --- I've been looking into zero-knowledge proofs for a long time. The performance has always been a bottleneck. How does Dusk solve this? --- Wait, as long as the audit can guarantee security, I don't believe a fully private chain can be trusted for safe use.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHoppervip
· 15h ago
Well, I have to admit there's some substance to this logic... The balance between transparency and privacy is indeed a real issue. Dusk's approach with ZK proofs sounds good, but when it actually goes on-chain and is implemented, will it be another story? But then again, will TradFi really lower its stance for DeFi? I remain skeptical. Wait, this permissioned chain design... feels like repeating the old tricks of traditional finance. Privacy is there, but what about decentralization? I'm a bit curious about how active Dusk's ecosystem is right now. It doesn't seem to be getting as much discussion.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEatervip
· 15h ago
Balancing privacy and transparency... Well said, but can Dusk really reassure large funds? It still depends on whether the ecosystem can get off the ground. DeFi definitely needs someone to fill this gap to break out of the circle; otherwise, how can institutions expose their positions? Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but how efficient are they on-chain? That’s the key. Wait, isn’t this just an upgraded version of private chains? So why doesn’t TradFi directly use consortium chains? That said, if Dusk can truly become an intermediary, it would indeed give traditional finance a stepping stone to exit. Honestly, finding a balance between privacy and auditability is very difficult, but if achieved, it could really mobilize trillions of dollars in funds.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)