Interesting things are happening. The official financial disclosure from the University of Chicago states that they haven't lost money on cryptocurrencies. However, there are rumors online that the university's endowment fund lost $6 billion. This is awkward— the endowment fund has been operating at a scale of $10-12 billion for many years, and a single loss of $6 billion is indeed outrageous. Is the official statement credible or are the rumors justified? This reflects the information asymmetry issue in institutional crypto investments, which is worth pondering.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DecentralizedElder
· 7h ago
60 billion? That must have been a huge loss, the school property fund is playing this big.
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 8h ago
Haha, this move is brilliant. The official "no loss" rumor turned into "lost 6 billion," and anyone would be confused.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 21h ago
lol so chicago uni really said "we're good" while allegedly hemorrhaging 6 billion on crypto? that's some next-level gas optimization for the truth ngl... institutions always pulling the veil when it hurts
Reply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 01-14 04:02
The official statement says there's no loss, but rumors claim a loss of 6 billion? That number is way too outrageous; someone must be lying.
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 01-14 04:01
Can you really believe the official claim of "no loss"? A hole of 6 billion, they must be trembling when they speak.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomad
· 01-14 03:56
nah, this smells like classic counter-party risk obfuscation... $60B on a $100-120B fund? that's not a loss, that's a complete liquidity fragmentation event waiting for postmortem analysis
Reply0
MoonlightGamer
· 01-14 03:53
The official statement is that there was no loss, but rumors say a loss of 6 billion? That number is way too outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-14 03:41
Hmm... the official says there's no loss, but the private sector claims a loss of 6 billion. This price difference is just too outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 01-14 03:34
The typical big institution blame-shifting tactic: saying there's no loss, then there's no loss.
Interesting things are happening. The official financial disclosure from the University of Chicago states that they haven't lost money on cryptocurrencies. However, there are rumors online that the university's endowment fund lost $6 billion. This is awkward— the endowment fund has been operating at a scale of $10-12 billion for many years, and a single loss of $6 billion is indeed outrageous. Is the official statement credible or are the rumors justified? This reflects the information asymmetry issue in institutional crypto investments, which is worth pondering.