Is there a point worth pondering: do European and American users really not care about Chinese coins? I don't think so. Keep in mind that many foreigners have Chinese characters tattooed on their bodies, and Chinese symbols themselves carry a global aesthetic value.
From another perspective, when a foreigner sees a coin with a Chinese name on the gainers list, that sense of unfamiliarity can actually spark their curiosity. Things they don't understand are often more likely to become topics of conversation — they might pull a friend and say, "Hey, look at this coin, I can't even understand the name," which can lead to word-of-mouth promotion.
From an exchange's point of view, there is actually a lot of room for operation. Creating a dedicated Chinese coin category, adjusting sorting weights, adding to default watchlists, etc., are all tools that can be used. Ultimately, it's about opening up a pathway for these coins to rise.
The real opportunity lies in whether you're willing to compete. Just riding the coattails of leading coins will definitely outperform most people. But to break through, you have to get into the trenches and fight.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfMadeRuggee
· 8h ago
Wow, this logic actually makes sense. The sense of unfamiliarity becomes a traffic secret? How did I not think of that?
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedian
· 01-14 03:52
Hey, this angle is interesting. Being a stranger is actually the traffic secret, really.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 01-14 03:52
This logic is indeed interesting; a sense of unfamiliarity might actually be the traffic secret.
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamon
· 01-14 03:52
Hmm... Based on 72-hour social media sentiment data, a sense of unfamiliarity can indeed boost topic popularity by about 43.7%. This logic still holds up (´•ω•̥`) But when it comes to the exchange's ranking and weighting operations, I think it still depends on trading volume data. Otherwise, even the most attractive rankings are just superficial.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnRead
· 01-14 03:52
This logic is indeed interesting; the sense of unfamiliarity might actually be the breakthrough point.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-14 03:30
This logic has some substance... The exchange ranking weight part indeed has arbitrage potential, but the problem is that the liquidity of Chinese tokens and mempool depth can't support it at all. A slight gas war can collapse the entire arbitrage mechanism. If you're really going to do it, it's better to focus on the entry point of flash loan arbitrage, which is much more reliable than word-of-mouth promotion.
Is there a point worth pondering: do European and American users really not care about Chinese coins? I don't think so. Keep in mind that many foreigners have Chinese characters tattooed on their bodies, and Chinese symbols themselves carry a global aesthetic value.
From another perspective, when a foreigner sees a coin with a Chinese name on the gainers list, that sense of unfamiliarity can actually spark their curiosity. Things they don't understand are often more likely to become topics of conversation — they might pull a friend and say, "Hey, look at this coin, I can't even understand the name," which can lead to word-of-mouth promotion.
From an exchange's point of view, there is actually a lot of room for operation. Creating a dedicated Chinese coin category, adjusting sorting weights, adding to default watchlists, etc., are all tools that can be used. Ultimately, it's about opening up a pathway for these coins to rise.
The real opportunity lies in whether you're willing to compete. Just riding the coattails of leading coins will definitely outperform most people. But to break through, you have to get into the trenches and fight.