2026-01-14 02:50:51

#策略性加码BTC Early trading gold performed well, once again touching the 18 integer level🎉 It seems that the bulls still have strength.

In the precious metals sector, entering at 4595 in spot trading was indeed a good point, and then decisively exiting at 4613. The rhythm was well managed. The risk control was set around 8900, providing ample space.

$XAU $PAXG and similar spot products have recently been testing temporary highs, and $ETH is also worth continuous observation. The strategy of increasing Bitcoin holdings seems to be brewing as well. The issue of balancing allocations between precious metals and cryptocurrencies still needs more consideration.

BTC-0,87%

PAXG0,02%

ETH-0,43%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ValidatorViking

· 01-14 15:41

nah, the real test is whether this holds when macro winds shift. seen too many "strong momentum" calls get absolutely slashed in 24hrs to get excited yet

Reply0

wagmi_eventually

· 01-14 03:17

4595 enters, 4613 exits. The rhythm is indeed on point, just need to keep up with the speed.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 01-14 03:06

ngl the whole "balanced allocation" thing sounds nice until you realize you're just fragmenting liquidity across multiple attack surfaces... seen too many people get rekt trying to optimize between gold and crypto without thinking about their actual risk exposure. 4595 entry is clean tho, respect the discipline.

Reply0

MetaReckt

· 01-14 03:04

Your timing is so precise, I have to ask if you're using a wallhack or something, haha.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e87b21ee

· 01-14 03:00

What does it matter if gold touches 18000 again? The key is whether it can break through. The bulls have been shouting for so long.

View OriginalReply0