2026-01-14 02:37:22

As market sentiment evolves, trading strategies naturally shift too. Bitcoin's been on an absolute rampage lately, crushing through short positions across the board. The move happened fast enough that I managed to exit my own shorts well ahead of things for a solid mid-three-figure gain. Sometimes being early on a directional call pays off when the momentum finally kicks in.

BTC-1,41%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-15 08:33

The recent surge in Bitcoin's price was truly unexpected, catching the bears off guard and leaving them completely overwhelmed... However, closing positions early still resulted in profits, with luck playing a major role.

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen

· 01-14 03:00

Getting out early really made a killing, just worried about a big reversal on the pullback.

View OriginalReply0

PonziWhisperer

· 01-14 02:59

This wave of Bitcoin is indeed fierce, but I always feel that those chasing at high levels are about to get trapped and stuck.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-14 02:56

Landing early is really satisfying, but this wave of gains isn't over yet.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-14 02:55

Basically, this is the old trick of momentum trading. But I have to say, when it comes to short positions being liquidated—have you ever thought about the underlying mechanism? Some exchanges' liquidation logic is the same as the contract code, needing to prevent re-entrancy vulnerabilities. I've seen too many cases where projects suffer from improper permission control, leading to the liquidation module being maliciously invoked.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessApe

· 01-14 02:53

All the bears are dead; those who were optimistic all along are laughing.

View OriginalReply0