The big players have recently taken action. An Ethereum position close to $30 million has started to be sold off in batches, with 2,450 ETH sold at once, while the account still holds a core position of 8,800 ETH. This operational logic is very clear—maintaining a bullish attitude but knowing when to realize some profits at high levels.
The entry cost is around $3,145, and now they are observing the market while placing limit orders. This is not about rushing to exit everything, but a typical step-by-step profit-locking strategy. It combines confidence that the core position will benefit from further gains with enough caution to avoid downside risks.
From the on-chain trading activity, Ethereum’s liquidity remains sufficient. The real profit-making logic is quite simple: follow the trend, understand segmented profit-taking, and hold heavy positions to win in the end. What do you think of this operational approach?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The big players have recently taken action. An Ethereum position close to $30 million has started to be sold off in batches, with 2,450 ETH sold at once, while the account still holds a core position of 8,800 ETH. This operational logic is very clear—maintaining a bullish attitude but knowing when to realize some profits at high levels.
The entry cost is around $3,145, and now they are observing the market while placing limit orders. This is not about rushing to exit everything, but a typical step-by-step profit-locking strategy. It combines confidence that the core position will benefit from further gains with enough caution to avoid downside risks.
From the on-chain trading activity, Ethereum’s liquidity remains sufficient. The real profit-making logic is quite simple: follow the trend, understand segmented profit-taking, and hold heavy positions to win in the end. What do you think of this operational approach?