#空投活动与分配 Lighter's recent anti-cheating measures are indeed quite interesting—using data science and clustering methods to identify bot accounts, then reallocating points to qualified traders. From a copy-trading perspective, this matter relates to the fairness of subsequent airdrop distribution and directly impacts the profit weights of genuine traders.
The core logic is clear: if the platform does not clean up fake trading accounts, those truly capable and worth following traders' profits will be diluted. Therefore, this round of rectification, from the perspective of selecting quality participants, is actually a good thing.
However, there are a few details worth noting: first, the algorithm details are not disclosed to prevent targeted optimization, which is very pragmatic; second, a dispute mechanism has been set up, indicating that the platform also admits the possibility of misjudgments. If you or the traders you follow are wrongly judged, submitting a dispute via the Discord form is a must.
Another signal that cannot be ignored—Lighter emphasizes that it will not adopt a dual-token/equity structure; all value points directly to the token itself. This means that the subsequent token distribution logic will be more transparent, and the final value of the airdrop will not be diluted.
For copy-trading players, the current opportunity lies in observing which traders can pass this round of review, and how their trading styles and profitability stability are. Once the distribution settles, these verified accounts will become more trustworthy options for copy trading.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#空投活动与分配 Lighter's recent anti-cheating measures are indeed quite interesting—using data science and clustering methods to identify bot accounts, then reallocating points to qualified traders. From a copy-trading perspective, this matter relates to the fairness of subsequent airdrop distribution and directly impacts the profit weights of genuine traders.
The core logic is clear: if the platform does not clean up fake trading accounts, those truly capable and worth following traders' profits will be diluted. Therefore, this round of rectification, from the perspective of selecting quality participants, is actually a good thing.
However, there are a few details worth noting: first, the algorithm details are not disclosed to prevent targeted optimization, which is very pragmatic; second, a dispute mechanism has been set up, indicating that the platform also admits the possibility of misjudgments. If you or the traders you follow are wrongly judged, submitting a dispute via the Discord form is a must.
Another signal that cannot be ignored—Lighter emphasizes that it will not adopt a dual-token/equity structure; all value points directly to the token itself. This means that the subsequent token distribution logic will be more transparent, and the final value of the airdrop will not be diluted.
For copy-trading players, the current opportunity lies in observing which traders can pass this round of review, and how their trading styles and profitability stability are. Once the distribution settles, these verified accounts will become more trustworthy options for copy trading.