2026-01-14 02:23:33

Looking at the trends in the CPU market, I realize that having early awareness can sometimes lead to pitfalls. In the coming days, various voices will emerge one after another, but my core logic has always been very clear:

Either you don't believe at all, or you believe early and believe strongly. Once you've missed the window, chasing the trend afterward is unlikely to yield good returns.

By the end of last year, insiders in the industry were well aware of this. When most people had built up 70-80% of their positions, those later voices only appeared belatedly—that's the reality of information flow.

I want to ask an interesting question: among the industry voices, why do some companies' statements get directly believed, while there is hesitation towards financial report data—especially those Q4 reports explicitly pointing out CPU shortages? This selective trust logic is indeed quite intriguing. The market always works this way: whoever gets information early is in a better position.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationOracle

· 19h ago

If I had known last year at the end of the year, I would have gone all in. Now it's too late to say these things. Information asymmetry is so cruel; whoever is faster makes money, it's that simple. The financial report clearly states a shortage, and some people are still hesitating? That logic is truly amazing. Instead of listening to all kinds of opinions, it's better to analyze the financial reports and look at the data yourself. Being cut less is already a profit. Insiders have already cashed out long ago. We who are still chasing the high hope to catch a bargain.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 19h ago

If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have been so conflicted about those later-stage issues. Information asymmetry is so cruel. Those who knew clearly at the end of last year had already jumped in; only now are the latecomers realizing, which is pure leek logic. Honestly, choosing to believe in this set blindly is really incomprehensible. The data is right there, yet you still need others to give the nod. Missing the right timing makes everything pointless. This is the game rule of Web3. The window period is fleeting; being even a step slow means falling behind by ten thousand steps. In the information flow game, the insiders always profit at the expense of outsiders. The difference between insiders and latecomers is so huge. Those who understood early have already taken action. Now chasing after it only results in eating dust.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 19h ago

I directly said it, information asymmetry is wealth asymmetry, and this principle applies equally in the crypto world. --- If I had known earlier, I wouldn't bother analyzing. It's just a gamble on who has the most up-to-date information. --- That's right, 99% of people only hear the sound when buying at a high, and it's already too late. --- I don't trust the financial report data; I believe whatever some big V influencers say in their hype. This logic is indeed perfect. --- Once the window period is missed, don't expect to turn things around; the market never waits for anyone. --- Why do some people believe in the same logic while others don't? Honestly, it's a gambling mentality. --- I've had a deep experience with early pitfalls in cognition; now I'm just waiting to see who wakes up later. --- Selective belief is a disease that needs treatment, but all of you are quite ill. --- The CPU thing is just like the "cutting leeks" scheme in the crypto circle; whoever comes early makes money.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 19h ago

Internal market fluctuates repeatedly, while the external market has long been played out. This is the cost of information asymmetry. Had I known last year, I would have gone all in back then. Now I can only watch others enjoy the gains. As for financial reports, honestly, everyone can understand them—it's just a matter of whether you want to believe it or not. This round of CPU, if you missed it, you really missed it—there's no way to make up for it. This guy is right; selective belief is just gambler's psychology. The market is the most realistic.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTinfoilHat

· 19h ago

Honestly, the information gap has always been the biggest profit logic. Being an early bird and catching the worm is the truth. People don't even look at the financial reports, but instead follow the words of certain institutions and go all in. That mindset is indeed outrageous. Once the window period closes, there's no going back. The blogger's point on this is spot on.

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 19h ago

Those who knew early on would have already jumped in. If you're still struggling with the financial report, it's really time to wake up. Information asymmetry is so cruel. Missing out at the end of last year now only leaves regret. Honestly, selective belief in this set is too common. It all depends on who dares to be the first mover. Those chasing the trend are always the retail investors; cognitive gaps mean money gaps. Most people still wait for others to step into the pit first, then follow the trend themselves.

View OriginalReply0