Trump's recent "big move" has caused a splash in the crypto world—America might use government bonds even more than Bitcoin. At first glance, it's quite novel; upon closer inspection, many questions arise. Is this a breakthrough in the financial system, or just a political stunt to boost the election campaign?
The market's reaction was immediate. Bitcoin was instantly elevated to the status of a "national-level asset," and the story of "digital gold" was reignited. In the short term, this policy signal indeed gave the crypto market a strong boost. But there's a problem—how exactly will it be implemented? How large will the scale be? What's the plan of action? All remains unclear.
On a practical level, regulatory frameworks are not yet established, market volatility remains fierce, and technical challenges have not been fully resolved. If it actually comes to fruition, all those hurdles will have to be overcome one by one. Don't expect miracles in the short term; risks are still present.
But from another perspective, if the US continues to send such signals, it’s possible that crypto assets will gradually become mainstream allocations, pushing for improved regulatory systems and attracting more institutional funds. From this angle, the long-term logic still exists.
In simple terms: hot topics are just that—hot topics. Stay calm. The policy direction is worth following, but from signal to actual implementation, there's still a long way to go. Is this an epoch-making innovation or just a market talking point? Let's watch and judge as we go.
What do you think? Can Bitcoin truly become a national asset, or is this just another election-driven propaganda war?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LuckyBlindCat
· 01-14 10:29
Here we go again, election year is the same old story. First, they hype Bitcoin to pay off debts, and then what? It's just a mess again.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 01-14 02:32
It's the same old trick from Trump again, sounding really good, but actually implementing it is still a long way off.
Paying off debt with Bitcoin? How would that work? Dump everything at once? Haha.
This wave of price increase is just a story being told; when the policies actually arrive, the price might crash instead.
The idea of Bitcoin as state-owned assets seems more like a way to hype BTC.
It's satisfying in the short term, but what about the long term? Without a regulatory framework, everyone is just hyping it up. Isn't this just cutting the leeks?
Honestly, policy signals are worth paying attention to, but don't get caught in a trap.
This wave is mainly institutions leveraging the hype to pump the market; retail investors following the trend are most likely to get burned.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 01-14 02:29
Here we go again with this? Signal, signal, it's always a signal, and there's not a single execution plan.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperer
· 01-14 02:20
Here we go again, chopping the leeks. I see through Trump's tricks.
If they really want to use Bitcoin to pay off debts, they should pass the bill first before bragging. Right now, it's all just air.
BTC is rising happily, but I'm worried about a reversal that could cut it in half. Those who are buying in now should be cautious.
Regulation hasn't kept up, liquidity is also a trap. It sounds good but is actually all bubbles.
Long-term? Let's see if we can survive this storm first.
Policy signals look good, but the money is really being lost.
It's just election tricks. The crypto circle should wake up and stop being fooled.
Empty talk everywhere. The key is how to implement it. It's too early to discuss this now.
I'm optimistic about the long-term, but the risk of this round of speculation is too high. I'm still on the sidelines.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 01-14 02:14
Using Bitcoin to pay off debts again... sounds great in theory, but in practice it might be a mess. If Trump can fool retail investors with this hand, what are the real institutions thinking?
#密码资产动态追踪 $SUI $DASH $XRP
Trump's recent "big move" has caused a splash in the crypto world—America might use government bonds even more than Bitcoin. At first glance, it's quite novel; upon closer inspection, many questions arise. Is this a breakthrough in the financial system, or just a political stunt to boost the election campaign?
The market's reaction was immediate. Bitcoin was instantly elevated to the status of a "national-level asset," and the story of "digital gold" was reignited. In the short term, this policy signal indeed gave the crypto market a strong boost. But there's a problem—how exactly will it be implemented? How large will the scale be? What's the plan of action? All remains unclear.
On a practical level, regulatory frameworks are not yet established, market volatility remains fierce, and technical challenges have not been fully resolved. If it actually comes to fruition, all those hurdles will have to be overcome one by one. Don't expect miracles in the short term; risks are still present.
But from another perspective, if the US continues to send such signals, it’s possible that crypto assets will gradually become mainstream allocations, pushing for improved regulatory systems and attracting more institutional funds. From this angle, the long-term logic still exists.
In simple terms: hot topics are just that—hot topics. Stay calm. The policy direction is worth following, but from signal to actual implementation, there's still a long way to go. Is this an epoch-making innovation or just a market talking point? Let's watch and judge as we go.
What do you think? Can Bitcoin truly become a national asset, or is this just another election-driven propaganda war?