2026-01-14 01:34:15

The evolution of social media algorithms has put us in an awkward situation: valuable genuine user comments have become a scarce commodity, while大量AI生成的低质内容充斥其中。

Some emerging projects are trying to address this issue. They incentivize real human interaction and participation through NFT sales, allocating a certain percentage (such as 5%) of the token supply to reward community contributors and active users. The logic behind this mechanism is straightforward: the higher your engagement, the greater your rewards.

This shift from "content is king" to "interaction is king" reflects Web3 projects' emphasis on community quality. By using economic incentives to encourage meaningful discussions rather than mechanical likes and shares, this could be a new approach to improving the social ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTArchaeologis

· 01-14 19:07

Speaking of which, this logic is somewhat similar to the elite system of the early forum era—just replacing the moderator's prestige with on-chain records. Interesting. Algorithms kill genuine opinions, economic incentives save the day? It sounds romantic, but can 5% tokens really filter out the gold or just create new trash? The key lies in whether the mechanism's gears bite hard enough. The old community logic of maintaining taste through scarcity is now being replicated at the social layer. Quite ironic. This move lives up to the name "Interaction is King," but the problem is—who defines the quality of interaction? It's just another set of algorithms. But it is indeed less destructive than the "Content is King" approach. At least it returns economic rights to real people.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDoomsDay

· 01-14 02:00

Algorithm poisoning has long been tired, and now finally someone is thinking of doing something interesting. Speaking of which, truly active users are indeed becoming fewer, most of them are just water armies and bots spamming there. A 5% token incentive sounds good, but the key is how to determine who is a genuine contributor... Don’t let it turn into insider trading in the end. Interaction is king, I buy into this approach; it's better than being drowned by robots. But honestly, economic incentives can also be easily exploited, and in the end, the ones who benefit the most are still the ones who milk the system.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTrapper

· 01-14 01:48

lmao 5% allocation for "community contributors" aka whoever shitposts the loudest... actually if you read the vesting schedule these tokens unlock right before the exit pump

Reply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 01-14 01:44

The scheme to earn coins is back again. Can genuine interaction really turn into money? This logic sounds good, but I'm afraid it will just become another wave of rug pulls. A 5% incentive sounds great, but who will define what constitutes meaningful discussion? The fact that algorithms kill genuine voices is really heartbreaking, but the solutions in the crypto world are often just so-so. Interaction as king? Ha, isn't it just going to evolve into mutual flattery and price pumping again? But on the other hand, at least some people are trying to change the status quo, which I quite support. The key is not to become another breeding ground for zombie fans and spamming machines. Projects that can truly attract quality users are the ones with a future; otherwise, it’s just another way to cut and run.

View OriginalReply0