2026-01-14 01:30:33

I don't usually share project reviews, but recently I gave Starknet a pretty good score. To be honest, the current ratings of Starknet on some review platforms do not accurately reflect the true situation, and it has been unfairly grouped with some low-quality projects in the industry. This is clearly unreasonable. Where is the problem? The main issue is the huge discrepancy between evaluation standards and market perception—some indicator weightings are improperly set, leading to those projects with real technical strength and ecosystem development being severely underestimated. Starknet performs well in core dimensions such as L2 ecosystem, developer support, and application implementation, but the scoring system does not accurately reflect this.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunitySlacker

· 19h ago

The scoring system is just a piece of trash; weights are randomly assigned, resulting in good projects being buried while trash can still bounce around.

View OriginalReply0

TideReceder

· 19h ago

The evaluation system is like this, with arbitrary weight assignments, causing good projects to be overlooked. Starknet truly deserves to be recognized.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 19h ago

The scoring system really needs to be improved; the weights are rigid to an absurd degree. It's a shame that Starknet has been overlooked.

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForAirdrops

· 19h ago

The weighting system on the evaluation platform is truly outrageous; it completely obscures Starknet's true value. --- In plain terms, it's because the data model hasn't kept up, and the ecosystem development and technical depth can't be quantified at all. --- I've long been annoyed by Starknet being underestimated; the projects that are actually getting things done are falling behind. --- That's why you can't just look at the rating rankings; you have to explore the ecosystem yourself, review the code, and talk to developers. --- No wonder so many potential projects are ignored on evaluation platforms; the standard design itself is flawed.

View OriginalReply0

BearEatsAll