2026-01-14 01:27:30

My investment principle is simple: projects without a locking mechanism are a straight pass; I do not participate. Even if there seems to be an opportunity, I am very cautious—if I do enter, it’s only to test the waters with a small position. This way, I can preserve the possibility of opportunities while effectively controlling risk exposure. After all, in the crypto world, risk management is often more important than betting on big gains.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredApeResistance

· 12h ago

You've been playing this set of logic for so long and you're still alive, you really have some skills.

View OriginalReply0

PoolJumper

· 12h ago

It seems conservative but actually smart; at least you won't get rug-pulled. That's the right way to survive until the next bull market.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSeller

· 12h ago

I also see clearly that the lock-in mechanism is a big trap, passing on it is the right choice.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit

· 13h ago

Bro, there's nothing wrong with this logic, but to be honest, it's still a bit conservative. --- The lock mechanism has many pitfalls; we need to learn how to avoid them. --- Testing with small amounts is the way to go; the most important thing is the betting mindset. --- In the crypto world, surviving longer is much more important than making quick profits. This has been a wake-up call. --- I've been burned before by projects that ran off without locking, so now I turn away from such projects immediately. --- Risk management = survival. Greedy people have already been buried.

View OriginalReply0