When evaluating a project's staying power, tokenomics tells you everything. Take $ZET for instance—the numbers paint a pretty clear picture.
Total supply caps at 100M tokens, with only 15M currently in circulation. The bulk remains locked under vesting schedules. This setup matters because it signals intentional supply management rather than the chaotic token dumps you see across weaker projects.
What's happening here is deliberate scarcity engineering. By controlling the release cadence, the team prevents the death spiral of constant selling pressure. It's the kind of discipline you'd expect from someone who actually understands macroeconomic principles—basically, whoever designed this tokenomics clearly knows what they're doing.
So when you're digging into a project, always ask: is supply being released thoughtfully, or are we watching a slow-motion collapse waiting to happen? That distinction matters far more than most people realize.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeTrustFund
· 9h ago
To be honest, this set of tokenomics looks quite elaborate, but we'll have to wait and see how the subsequent unlocks are hammered out...
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 01-13 23:13
NGL, this lock-up design is definitely much better than projects that dump right from the start... I'm just worried that when the unlock happens later, it will turn into another drama.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-13 23:12
Nah, it sounds good, but in the end, it all depends on the unlock schedule... the real test is still to come.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 01-13 23:11
100M total supply but only 15% in circulation—that's real tokenomics design. Most projects have already dumped their tokens.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 01-13 23:11
Hmm, basically it's about whether the team has managed the supply well; otherwise, social death is only a matter of time.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-13 22:59
15M circulating supply out of 100M total supply, this tokenomics does have some substance. But to be honest, how long the lock-up schedule can hold depends on the team's integrity. Once the vesting unlocks and everything is dumped all at once, it's game over.
When evaluating a project's staying power, tokenomics tells you everything. Take $ZET for instance—the numbers paint a pretty clear picture.
Total supply caps at 100M tokens, with only 15M currently in circulation. The bulk remains locked under vesting schedules. This setup matters because it signals intentional supply management rather than the chaotic token dumps you see across weaker projects.
What's happening here is deliberate scarcity engineering. By controlling the release cadence, the team prevents the death spiral of constant selling pressure. It's the kind of discipline you'd expect from someone who actually understands macroeconomic principles—basically, whoever designed this tokenomics clearly knows what they're doing.
So when you're digging into a project, always ask: is supply being released thoughtfully, or are we watching a slow-motion collapse waiting to happen? That distinction matters far more than most people realize.