2026-01-13 22:39:20

Missing out on hot coins is not a matter of ability; it's mostly a lack of action. The real strategy is simple: first, figure out who is doing what in the community, and understand the background and expertise of each project team. When you see a reliable project, establish a position, then share your investment logic. If the project itself is solid and the community's recognition is high, the popularity will naturally grow organically. This is not a secret—it's about systematically doing your homework, validating consensus, and then taking action.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirDropMissed

· 01-14 04:56

Speaking casually, how many can truly stick to doing their homework? Most still just rush in when they see a bullish trend.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 01-13 23:08

Sounds good, but what about action? I just want to ask how many people can really stick to doing their homework. Most of them only regret it after seeing the prices go up.

View OriginalReply0

tx_pending_forever

· 01-13 23:07

It's easy to say, but how about actually executing? I'm still the same, hesitating when I see opportunities, and by the time I react, it has already tripled.

View OriginalReply0

NoStopLossNut

· 01-13 23:06

That's right, you just need to get moving. Checking the market every day isn't as good as digging deeper into projects.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-13 23:06

Research shows that there is a cognitive bias worth noting here—lack of action is only a surface phenomenon; fundamentally, it reflects a deficiency in information filtering ability. Data indicates that 92% of investors who miss out on hot opportunities are actually overwhelmed by a flood of low-quality information, rather than simply lacking execution power. From a technical perspective, the framework for project background checks should include three dimensions: 1) on-chain activity indicators 2) team code submission frequency 3) community consensus quantification assessment. The simple sharing logic is indeed effective, but the data model support behind it is often overlooked. Citing a 2023 study on crypto investment behavior— the real bottleneck is not in action, but in the standardized quantification of what "reliable" means. What is your standard? That determines everything.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDetective

· 01-13 23:03

To put it simply, actionability is indeed the dividing line, but this theory works well in a bull market. What about in a bear market? I want to ask, how many people can truly systematically verify consensus rather than follow the crowd?

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-13 23:02

Ha, easy to say, but how many can actually follow through? Most people are still just bragging in Telegram.

View OriginalReply0