2026-01-13 21:39:18

What to watch for in the QF project is that they not only publicly share all development content on GitHub, but team member information is also completely transparent. This open and transparent approach is actually rare in the industry.

The key point is that the real test begins once the mainnet is officially launched. From the 1M chart, it is currently in a consolidation phase, with obvious signs of building momentum.

If this pace can continue, the upcoming trend could be very interesting. In the short term, the $10 price level might be the first key target.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FUD_Vaccinated

· 4h ago

The high level of transparency actually makes me a bit worried, it's too easy to be targeted. Mainnet launch is the real test; it's too early to say anything now. The $10 target sounds quite optimistic, but what about the mainstream narrative? There aren't many open-source projects on GitHub, but the true measure is whether the technology itself is solid. Accumulation is just absorbing the funds; I see some clues, but you need to find the ignition point. I like the team transparency approach; at least it's not behind closed doors, much better than some projects. The 1M level still needs to be observed; don't rush to go all-in, wait until there's volume.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeGazer

· 13h ago

The high transparency is indeed rare, but I wonder if it can withstand the market test after the mainnet launch. $10 feels a bit conservative; once the consolidation ends, it might take off directly. Open development on GitHub definitely adds points; at least scam projects can't be so detailed. Before the mainnet launch, it's all on paper; the key is to look at real data. However, now waiting for it to break out is a strategy; this buildup phase usually doesn't last too long.

View OriginalReply0

NftBankruptcyClub

· 01-13 22:08

Transparency definitely adds points, but you'll only know how well it performs once the mainnet goes live. Once the mainnet is launched, you can immediately see what's real and what's fake. What's the point of consolidating now? $10? I think it's unlikely. Projects like this usually give you a false impression. There are plenty of transparent projects on GitHub, but in the end, it's just a mess. Let's wait and see. I don't dare to chase this price level in the short term. Team transparency is good, but let's see if the ecosystem can actually get off the ground. Feels like another round of narrative games. Don't be fooled, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-13 22:08

High transparency is good, but I'm worried it might turn into another story after launch. Can $10 really be achieved?

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinHunter

· 01-13 21:55

Transparency definitely adds points, but whether it can stand firm after going live depends on other factors. As for the $10 level, I think we should aim to break $5 first.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTrapper

· 01-13 21:49

yeah so "completely transparent" until vesting schedules hit... actually if you read the contract the team allocation is pretty wild ngl

Reply0