2026-01-13 21:25:41

The ecosystem layout of top-tier exchanges is never a solo battle. Recently, another investment was made in GeniusTerminal, while Aster has temporarily faded from view. The core logic of this approach is very clear—don't believe in "monopoly," only believe in "germ competition." By differentiating the DEX product line to block competitors, and predicting the market with multiple strategies, pushing one after another.

Behind the frantic blood-making is a more brutal blood exchange. Ultimately, whoever can drive traffic, who can become the ecosystem engine, will hold the discourse power. OpenMind AGI should be close to TGE, and the project team is also accelerating progress. Additionally, rumors of DC rebranding as Fabric are circulating, and these small moves are hinting at deep adjustments within the ecosystem.

Ultimately, this is an invisible arms race—using investments, product innovation, and ecosystem collaboration to build moats.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 21h ago

I need to note down the Aster fade-out thing. According to the database, this is another "strategic adjustment"—how long has it been since the last major exchange changed its tone... Is the OpenMind TGE coming soon? I suggest it be included in the Guinness World Records. This set of "cultivation and competition" talk sounds like it's just paving the way for delays.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 21h ago

The competition of养蛊 (Gu Cultivation) is brilliant, it's just openly dismissing and killing the donkey after卸磨 (unloading the mill). --- Why did Aster just fade out? It felt like it was still in the spotlight two months ago. --- Basically, whoever has more traffic gets to speak, and the name生态引擎 (Ecological Engine) sounds painful just hearing it. --- Is the DC to Fabric change reliable? I always feel there's a story behind the name change. --- Moats, moats—these big players have been drawing their lines for so many years, but whose is the deepest? --- Walking on multiple legs is really ruthless; while opponents are still thinking about single-point breakthroughs, they've already expanded. --- OpenMind AGI coming soon for TGE? This pace is a bit fast. --- The era of monopolies is long gone; now, whoever has more product lines wins. --- Predictive markets are launching one after another; could they all backfire? --- It feels like what exchanges are doing is a capital arms race—whoever raises more money can expand more easily.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHustler

· 21h ago

The competition of raising bugs is basically about fearing being backstabbed by a single project. It's still the old tricks. --- OpenMind is really close, but I haven't heard about Fabric changing its name. Who leaked that? --- Traffic is king, but in the end, it still depends on who can retain people. Everything else is pointless. --- Aster stepping back is just stepping back; the next one is coming. The exchange ecosystem is just like this, competing fiercely. --- The moat, the moat, the problem is how many days this moat can last. --- Launching new projects one after another, it's really annoying. Is there really no one that can truly compete? --- Ultimately, the right to speak still belongs to capital. Retail investors like us continue to suffer losses. --- Walking on multiple legs sounds good, but it's actually trial and error. Who knows what the success rate is?

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 21h ago

The concept of蛊 (insect breeding competition) is brilliant. Basically, it's big fish eating small fish, small fish eating shrimp. Why is Aster gone? It was quite popular not long ago. Is OpenMind TGE coming? Hopefully this time it won't be another air coin. Switching DC to Fabric—this move is increasingly resembling a shell company going public. It all depends on who can keep users engaged; everything else is just empty talk. The real moat is probably money—throw in cash and go all the way. The problem is, how many of these investments will actually produce useful products? Nine out of ten projects are scams. Small moves, small hints—what are they implying? Just say it directly. I'm tired of this kind of rhetoric. Wait, the traffic engine is the key; everything else is nonsense.

View OriginalReply0