This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_therapist
· 4h ago
Oh my, that's why I still hold spot assets. DeFi is too complicated.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 8h ago
That's why I've always felt that BTC is just a second-class citizen in DeFi...
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPrice
· 8h ago
Really, BTC is just a burden in DeFi... bridging back and forth, the transaction fees eat up half of the gains.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddy
· 8h ago
That's why I still mainly hold spot assets; DeFi is too complicated, and the risks stack up together.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 8h ago
That's why I still prefer Layer 2 solutions; BTC has been messed up in the Ethereum ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyArbCat
· 8h ago
Hi... Nap warning, BTC's set of operations really makes me want to doze off. Packaging, bridging, custody risks... Just thinking about the gas fees gives me a headache.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 8h ago
ngl the wrapper rabbit hole is insane... analyzed the code on like half these bridges and red flags everywhere. custody risk alone should've been a dealbreaker years ago tbh
Reply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 8h ago
Honestly, BTC in DeFi is just an old man; it needs to be served in every way.
Packaging, bridging, custodial risks... all the fuss just to earn some interest. I feel it's better to just hold spot assets directly.
Bitcoin users find it troublesome to do anything—borrowing, earning interest, obtaining liquidity—all require leaving the Bitcoin ecosystem.
Either wrap it, bridge it, or accept floating rates and MEV risks, and even bear custody risks... just to make BTC usable in DeFi.
This entire experience has never felt truly satisfying.