2026-01-13 20:41:32

Glad Elon took over X. Looking at how BlueSky operates, I can see the blueprint now—this is probably what the vision was supposed to be all along. A decentralized social platform that actually gives users control over their own experience. The contrast between the two approaches really highlights what's possible when you rethink platform governance from the ground up.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 9h ago

Bluesky's decentralized approach sounds good, but can it really work... x things are pretty chaotic right now anyway.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 17h ago

NGL, Bluesky's approach is indeed cleaner than X's current management style. If the decentralized approach can really be implemented, that would be a win.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-13 21:06

Bluesky indeed has a different approach, but to be honest, who is really using it... it still feels mostly like a gimmick.

View OriginalReply0

ThreeHornBlasts

· 01-13 21:06

Centralization and decentralization are really two different paths. Bluesky looks comfortable, but it's hard to say how long it will last.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-13 20:46

I've been listening to the theory of decentralized governance for five years, and I just want to see how long Bluesky's daily active users can sustain. According to data, last year's DAU was only a few million, compared to X's hundreds of millions... The blueprint you mentioned seems more like an ideal country setting to me.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 01-13 20:42

Hmm... BlueSky seems promising, but can it really get off the ground? I feel like it still depends on whether they can retain users in the future.

View OriginalReply0