What's striking is how the community overwhelmingly supports secure voting mechanisms, yet there's barely any real movement to implement it. The silence is deafening—you'd think with this level of backing, action would follow. Instead, it gets swept under the rug like it doesn't matter. It's puzzling how such a clear consensus gets ignored.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWaster69
· 01-13 21:04
This is the common problem of Web3: talking nicely but not actually doing anything.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 01-13 21:03
What's the use of saying all this? It still can't withstand the voice of capital.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGas
· 01-13 20:49
This is a typical case of game equilibrium failure. Consensus exists, but incentives are misaligned, and no one is willing to bear the interaction costs for it.
What's striking is how the community overwhelmingly supports secure voting mechanisms, yet there's barely any real movement to implement it. The silence is deafening—you'd think with this level of backing, action would follow. Instead, it gets swept under the rug like it doesn't matter. It's puzzling how such a clear consensus gets ignored.