Similar to other onchain yield strategies, the protocol channels earned yield to increase the $SOL Per Share (SPS) value while simultaneously funding operational costs. This dual mechanism ensures sustainable growth of the reserve while maintaining platform viability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-13 20:57
Once again, the old trick of SPS value-added is being played. It sounds good, but can it really hold up? I ran my quantitative model, and I feel there are quite a few risks hidden here. Everyone, be cautious.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 01-13 20:51
It's just stacking the profits back for self-growth, and leaving some funds for operations... This tactic, the Sol ecosystem has already become rotten.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 01-13 20:41
This is just the old trick of reinvesting returns, but indeed, many projects in the Solana ecosystem play this way. Let's see how long it can last.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 01-13 20:39
The SOL Per Share logic has actually been overused for a long time, and the problem is that most projects ultimately die on the words "sustainable"...
Similar to other onchain yield strategies, the protocol channels earned yield to increase the $SOL Per Share (SPS) value while simultaneously funding operational costs. This dual mechanism ensures sustainable growth of the reserve while maintaining platform viability.