Privacy blockchain is a topic that many people jump into with technical terms like zk-SNARKs and homomorphic encryption, as if these terms alone represent everything. But what truly boosts institutional trust and makes them willing to migrate assets on-chain is never just these words themselves.



Recently, I’ve reviewed a lot of materials and had in-depth conversations with several friends working in compliant financial infrastructure. One project’s approach really moved me—Dusk doesn’t just say "we support privacy," but integrates compliance frameworks directly into the underlying design of the chain. That’s the right way.

Imagine the real concerns of institutions. A chain claims to be "compliance-friendly," but when institutions actually want to turn stocks and bonds into tokens and issue them on-chain, their worries go far beyond transaction confidentiality. Identity verification (KYC) must be in place, each transaction’s authorization chain needs to be traceable, and regulators should be able to selectively disclose key data when conducting audits. These considerations have been incorporated into Dusk’s protocol design from the start. Their proposed Confidential Security Token standard is like providing issuers with a complete compliance toolkit—protecting transaction details while allowing regulators to access data when necessary. This is the true form of "programmable privacy," and it’s also the confidence that makes institutions willing to participate.

From a technical implementation perspective, DuskEVM’s launch has indeed lowered development barriers. Interestingly, this chain did not abandon its privacy features just because it is EVM-compatible. Developers write contracts in Solidity, and behind the scenes, they are automatically protected by zero-knowledge proofs. For programmers, this process feels seamless, but the practicality is not compromised at all. Their testnet is already running some experimental projects, and the feedback looks promising.
DUSK-5,15%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenApeSurfervip
· 14h ago
Designing compliance into the underlying architecture—that's true "Privacy+". Much better than those flashy technical jargon.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeekvip
· 01-13 20:52
Ah, finally someone is telling the truth. Just shouting technical terms is really useless. Compliance is indeed the real bottleneck for institutional on-chain adoption. I've also been observing Dusk's approach for a while; integrating KYC and traceability into the protocol core is definitely a viable idea. But honestly, whether DuskEVM compatibility can truly be seamless for developers remains to be seen. It depends on how the ecosystem develops later.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 01-13 20:52
Damn, someone finally hit the nail on the head. Those who go on about zk this and zk that all day really think that shouting a couple of terms can scare institutions? So naive. What institutions want has never been privacy concepts; it's KYC tracing and regulatory compliance. Dusk's approach indeed hits the right spot. But the term "programmable privacy" just sounds much better.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomadvip
· 01-13 20:44
Incorporating the compliance framework into the underlying design is a pragmatic approach. Merely shouting technical terms won't convince anyone. --- Institutions need a complete toolkit to enter the market, not just a privacy gimmick. --- Zero-knowledge proof automatically protects privacy without increasing development difficulty; this idea确实有点东西. --- Selective data disclosure windows for regulators—other chains haven't even thought of this move. --- The feedback from the testnet is pretty good? It depends on what project is running; otherwise, it's just superficial. --- True privacy isn't about hiding from regulators; it's about protecting institutional privacy within a compliance framework, which makes a big difference. --- If DuskEVM can truly lower development barriers without compromising privacy, it will indeed change the game. --- Institutional concerns mainly revolve around KYC, traceability, and auditing. Incorporating these into protocol design is the real deal.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196vip
· 01-13 20:28
Hey, isn't true privacy compliance supposed to be like this? Someone should have clarified this issue long ago.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)