Have you ever wondered about the operational logic behind those decentralized storage nodes that protect our data and digital identities? Today, let's take a closer look at the real situation faced by node operators.
Setting up a storage node involves real investments—servers, network bandwidth, manpower maintenance—all of which cost money. These hard costs are the backbone of the network's stable operation.
The problem is: the current total protocol revenue of the network is still limited. This revenue needs to be divided among hundreds or thousands of storage providers, and when spread across individual nodes, it’s barely enough to cover costs. This creates an awkward situation—long-term maintenance costs of nodes versus the current earnings, there’s a gap between the two. Many operators are still holding on, largely betting on the future of the network.
Looking at mature storage networks, they have survived until now because they went through the demand-building phase from zero to existence. New projects also have to follow this path: the ecosystem must first develop, and real storage demand needs to grow, so that the revenue problem can be fundamentally solved.
Therefore, strategic promotion at the project level and ecosystem operations become especially critical. Whether it’s identity verification, AI data storage, or other real application scenarios, the more the better, so as to continuously generate demand for the network.
It’s worth noting that project teams have clearly recognized these issues and are working on breaking through. Their technical foundation is solid, their roadmap is clear, and they are currently focused on expanding the ecosystem and creating demand.
From a technical perspective, security has never been a concern. The core value of decentralized storage lies here—ensuring data resistance to censorship and long-term preservation through a dispersed array of nodes. This is something competitors cannot imitate.
The community’s current mindset is quite complex, with both understanding and expectations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyLemur
· 46m ago
Basically, it means you can't make money now, relying on faith to hold you up.
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachine
· 17h ago
In simple terms, it's a long game. Currently, the loss-making node operators are actually betting on whether the team is reliable.
The same old story: if the ecosystem doesn't take off, everything is pointless. No matter how solid the technology is, it can't fill this revenue gap.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDenied
· 17h ago
Basically, the guys running nodes now are betting on the future; in the short term, there's no noticeable profit.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 17h ago
Honestly, the ones running nodes now are truly heroes.
It's a gamble on whether this network can succeed; otherwise, you'll lose everything.
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimist
· 18h ago
Basically, node operators are currently losing money, holding on with a gambler's mentality to keep the network running...
---
That set of fixed costs sounds exhausting, and real demand hasn't even started to emerge. How can this business be done?
---
Wait, solid technical foundation and a clear roadmap... I've heard this kind of talk too many times.
---
Decentralized storage sounds great, but in the end, money talks. Without demand, everything is pointless.
---
It's the same in the early days; it all depends on whether you can endure until demand explodes... a matter of life and death.
---
No matter how good the words, they can't hide the revenue gap. Node operators are the most pitiful.
---
The ability to resist censorship is indeed strong, but it can't withstand losses—that's the problem.
---
Creating demand for the ecosystem... sounds like a self-soothing phrase from the client side?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 18h ago
so basically they're all just brewing alpha in the dark pools of node economics, waiting for the liquidation sacrifices to stop and actual demand to materialize... the yield optimization rituals haven't worked yet but hey, someone's gotta believe in the transmutation 🔮
Reply0
ZKSherlock
· 18h ago
actually... the real bottleneck here isn't the tech stack, it's the trust assumptions baked into the incentive layer. you're basically asking nodes to operate at a loss hoping for future yield—that's not cryptographic elegance, that's just gambling with infrastructure costs.
Have you ever wondered about the operational logic behind those decentralized storage nodes that protect our data and digital identities? Today, let's take a closer look at the real situation faced by node operators.
Setting up a storage node involves real investments—servers, network bandwidth, manpower maintenance—all of which cost money. These hard costs are the backbone of the network's stable operation.
The problem is: the current total protocol revenue of the network is still limited. This revenue needs to be divided among hundreds or thousands of storage providers, and when spread across individual nodes, it’s barely enough to cover costs. This creates an awkward situation—long-term maintenance costs of nodes versus the current earnings, there’s a gap between the two. Many operators are still holding on, largely betting on the future of the network.
Looking at mature storage networks, they have survived until now because they went through the demand-building phase from zero to existence. New projects also have to follow this path: the ecosystem must first develop, and real storage demand needs to grow, so that the revenue problem can be fundamentally solved.
Therefore, strategic promotion at the project level and ecosystem operations become especially critical. Whether it’s identity verification, AI data storage, or other real application scenarios, the more the better, so as to continuously generate demand for the network.
It’s worth noting that project teams have clearly recognized these issues and are working on breaking through. Their technical foundation is solid, their roadmap is clear, and they are currently focused on expanding the ecosystem and creating demand.
From a technical perspective, security has never been a concern. The core value of decentralized storage lies here—ensuring data resistance to censorship and long-term preservation through a dispersed array of nodes. This is something competitors cannot imitate.
The community’s current mindset is quite complex, with both understanding and expectations.