2026-01-13 19:24:20

Walrus Protocol has gradually gained the trust of developers in 2026 through its strong technical capabilities and community-oriented approach. A recent example clearly illustrates this—when the competing project Tusky faced shutdown, the Walrus Foundation took proactive steps, not only extending the migration window to March 19, 2026, but also releasing detailed migration guides and even recommending multiple Sui ecosystem storage solutions, including their own. At first glance, this approach might seem disadvantageous, but in reality, it reflects a rare long-term vision—putting builders first.

This attitude is translating into tangible ecosystem growth. Projects that originally depended on Tusky are now migrating to Walrus for simple reasons: lower costs, stronger fault tolerance, and permanent data availability. Realtbook is a good example; the entire Bookie NFT collection is permanently on-chain, eliminating worries about the sudden disappearance of centralized services. More and more developers are starting to treat Walrus as the default storage layer for deploying AI model datasets, game resources, and even entire full-chain websites.

On the technical side, Walrus also demonstrates impressive capabilities. It uses erasure coding and distributed blob design to ensure efficient data distribution and recovery in a decentralized network. Even with node fluctuations, recovery speed remains far superior to most competitors. Coupled with the Sui object model, developers can easily implement data programmability by referencing blob hashes directly in smart contracts—an approach that was previously unimaginable.

The $WAL token provides a clear incentive mechanism for ecosystem participation: paying for storage, staking for rewards, and participating in governance voting. As more projects join, network effects are accelerating. Walrus does not chase hot trends but focuses on solving two real pain points: data persistence and ownership. This steady approach is especially valuable in 2026, amid tightening regulations and the AI wave. It is quietly becoming the preferred infrastructure for developers building the next generation of applications.

WAL0,19%

SUI2,89%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockDetective

· 12h ago

This is the right attitude—relying on strength, not marketing. True long-termism is much more sincere than those projects that boast every day. Wait, why didn't I hear about Tusky shutting down earlier? The public opinion control this time is pretty good. The fact that data is permanently accessible really hits the pain point; centralized storage can cause a lot of trouble. The incentive design of WAL is quite clear, not some vague promise. To be honest, Walrus's move this time has gained not only users but also credibility. Recommending competitors as well? That confidence is a bit over the top.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 12h ago

*adjusts alchemical instruments* the erasure coding transmutation here is chef's kiss... data persistence as the philosopher's stone, finally materializing. walrus isn't chasing yield mirages like the rest of us degenerates.

Reply0

SnapshotBot

· 12h ago

This is the true infrastructure mindset, unlike some projects that are always thinking about cutting leeks every day. --- Tusky closed Walrus and even took the initiative to help with migration. This approach is indeed brilliant; long-termism really pays off. --- Wait, permanent on-chain data sounds good, but will the gas fees be outrageous? --- Erasure coding + distributed blob, to be honest, I haven't seen such a combination before. --- $WAL this token is a bit interesting, but it still depends on whether the number of ecosystem projects can keep up. --- The case of realtbook indeed illustrates the point; Walrus has nothing to say about reliability. --- I just want to ask a soul-searching question: what if the Sui chain itself encounters problems? --- Instead of chasing hot topics every day, it's better to root down and build infrastructure like Walrus. I respect this mindset. --- A stable approach? Hearing this term in the crypto world is a bit suspicious; time will tell. --- Once the default storage layer position is stabilized, the network effect will explode exponentially.

View OriginalReply0

rugged_again

· 12h ago

Haha, Walrus's move is really a reverse operation, recommending competitors instead of their own fans. Whether it can be supported or not is uncertain, but this attitude truly touches the heart. Low cost and permanent data are two strong points, no wonder developers are flocking here. But I'm just worried that if the hype comes up again, it might ruin everything. Let's wait and see. How is $WAL's incentive mechanism? Has anyone hopped on? Did Tusky's legacy transfer so completely? It's a bit nostalgic. Projects that truly get things done are actually quite rare; most just run after making a quick profit. I don't understand the technical details very well, but judging from the migration speed, there’s definitely something there. Permanent on-chain sounds great, but will the fees spike later?

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 12h ago

Looking down on competitors and actively helping others migrate? This long-term approach to cutting is truly silent, and the chip distribution shows that major players are already secretly laying out their plans. Technology can indeed be effective, but don’t forget that the critical point of network effects has not yet been reached. It’s a bit early to claim that the current trend is a proven fact. WAL’s incentive mechanism design is clever, but the concern is that excessive inflation pressure may be released later, revealing the identity of the latecomers as the bagholders. This is the real risk release signal—too many good stories piled up, beware of overheated market sentiment indicators. Tusky’s project actively seeks to align, but behind it is cost pressure rather than faith. Don’t be fooled by the illusion of ecosystem growth; probabilistic strategies tell me we’ll see the results in three months.

View OriginalReply0