There are whale-level projects on the Sol chain, and suddenly a dark horse emerged on BSC. These types of projects inherently carry the story of a "dark horse." But when it comes to truly credible MEME coins, the key lies in the aesthetic judgment of listing.
Striking this balance is indeed difficult—being too sycophantic can seem LOW, while being too aloof can lead to a lack of resonance. Truly positive projects, on the other hand, are more likely to resonate with the community.
Interestingly, many MEME projects now compete in cultural attributes. Instead of constantly creating conflicts between sycophants and critics, it's better to develop content that can spread real value. Only such projects can have stronger community vitality.
To be frank: the outcome is still uncertain, and we are all participants. Whoever can find that balance between aesthetics and value will stand out from the crowd.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CodeAuditQueen
· 01-14 01:57
Basically, it's a design issue with the smart contract. No matter how beautifully the contract code is written, if the community consensus isn't reached, it's all for nothing. I've reviewed too many project audit reports; aesthetics can't be incorporated into that.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 01-14 01:23
Aesthetics are really difficult; being overly eager is indeed LOW, but if you're too aloof, no one will buy it.
Positive energy MEMEs are actually more lively; this statement hits the nail on the head.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 01-13 19:54
The balance between aesthetics and value is well said, but I see that most projects are still gambling on luck.
Those who truly stick to positive energy core have long been淘汰ed by the market.
No matter how many BSC dark horses there are, it's just a game of probability.
This wave favors projects with strong cultural attributes, which are indeed more risk-resistant in the long run.
But to be honest, right now, traffic is still king, and things like aesthetics... are a bit idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarber
· 01-13 19:53
Aesthetics are well said, but few projects can truly grasp it.
---
The story of dark horses is indeed captivating, but I think most are just fleeting moments.
---
I agree that positive energy projects are more solid, but the community needs to genuinely believe in them.
---
Honestly, I'm now more worried about the practical implementation of projects that still focus on cultural attributes.
---
As for the balance point, by the time it's truly found, the cycle probably has changed again.
---
The opposition between licking dogs and haters is indeed annoying, but it seems that without it, there’s less buzz?
---
The phrase "The universe is not yet decided" sounds grand, but risk and opportunity are always two sides of the same coin; we need to be cautious.
---
Aesthetic limits are truly top-notch; trying too hard to please can come off as deliberate.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 01-13 19:53
The words are correct, but I'm just afraid it's another pretext to cut the leeks again.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 01-13 19:49
Aesthetics are important, but when it comes to MEME coins that can truly survive... I think it still depends on genuine community recognition, not just stacking positive energy labels.
How far can that dark horse on BSC run? The key is whether it really has substance, not just selling stories.
There are whale-level projects on the Sol chain, and suddenly a dark horse emerged on BSC. These types of projects inherently carry the story of a "dark horse." But when it comes to truly credible MEME coins, the key lies in the aesthetic judgment of listing.
Striking this balance is indeed difficult—being too sycophantic can seem LOW, while being too aloof can lead to a lack of resonance. Truly positive projects, on the other hand, are more likely to resonate with the community.
Interestingly, many MEME projects now compete in cultural attributes. Instead of constantly creating conflicts between sycophants and critics, it's better to develop content that can spread real value. Only such projects can have stronger community vitality.
To be frank: the outcome is still uncertain, and we are all participants. Whoever can find that balance between aesthetics and value will stand out from the crowd.