RWA and privacy chain tracks have indeed fallen into some difficulties in recent years. On one hand, some people hype up whitepapers with grandiose claims, even before writing a single line of code, just drawing pictures and then leaving; on the other hand, some teams stack up technical features but ignore compliance, ultimately only entertaining themselves within small circles. Under such contrast, the overall track appears somewhat chaotic.
But Dusk's approach breaks this pattern. It has not chosen a marketing-driven route nor fallen into the trap of pure technical showmanship. Instead, it focuses on a very practical issue: what is the core pain point for institutional on-chain adoption? It’s not flashy features, but the combination of compliance and privacy.
From a technical architecture perspective, Dusk adopts a layered design approach. It splits the entire chain into two parts: DuskDS settlement layer and DuskEVM application layer. The settlement layer focuses on data availability and second-level finality; for institutional transactions, quick confirmation and data stability are the most practical needs. The application layer directly supports the EVM ecosystem and has built-in privacy features, meaning developers do not need to re-adapt and can quickly get started with existing tools, greatly lowering the entry barrier.
This "specialized roles" architecture addresses the core efficiency issues from development to deployment in practice. For the RWA track, this implementation-oriented approach is truly the direction worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
RWA and privacy chain tracks have indeed fallen into some difficulties in recent years. On one hand, some people hype up whitepapers with grandiose claims, even before writing a single line of code, just drawing pictures and then leaving; on the other hand, some teams stack up technical features but ignore compliance, ultimately only entertaining themselves within small circles. Under such contrast, the overall track appears somewhat chaotic.
But Dusk's approach breaks this pattern. It has not chosen a marketing-driven route nor fallen into the trap of pure technical showmanship. Instead, it focuses on a very practical issue: what is the core pain point for institutional on-chain adoption? It’s not flashy features, but the combination of compliance and privacy.
From a technical architecture perspective, Dusk adopts a layered design approach. It splits the entire chain into two parts: DuskDS settlement layer and DuskEVM application layer. The settlement layer focuses on data availability and second-level finality; for institutional transactions, quick confirmation and data stability are the most practical needs. The application layer directly supports the EVM ecosystem and has built-in privacy features, meaning developers do not need to re-adapt and can quickly get started with existing tools, greatly lowering the entry barrier.
This "specialized roles" architecture addresses the core efficiency issues from development to deployment in practice. For the RWA track, this implementation-oriented approach is truly the direction worth paying attention to.