2026-01-13 16:35:45

This project has indeed been gaining popularity recently, attracting many new users to register and try out. Growth is a good thing, but the accompanying issues are also obvious—the platform is filled with a large number of BOT accounts, which are only interested in registration rewards and have little interest in the product itself.

The project team later issued a statement saying that if identified as BOT behavior, the rewards would be canceled, but the key point is that they will not notify users of the specific criteria for judgment in advance. This makes it quite awkward for ordinary participants.

My suggestion is that instead of worrying about those uncertainties, it’s better to focus on genuinely experiencing the product. Explore more features, share usage insights, and this way, you can gain a deeper understanding of the project ecosystem and contribute more valuable feedback to the community. Compared to speculative registrations, this approach not only helps avoid risks but also makes more sense.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

liquidation_watcher

· 11h ago

Bots are everywhere, and project teams don't specify standards. Isn't this just setting traps for people to fall into? It's safer to play it straight and focus on developing solid products.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityLarry

· 11h ago

Bots are everywhere, and project teams still hide and refuse to specify standards. This approach is truly disappointing. It's better to do real work than to play around with illusions. Only by experiencing it firsthand will you feel confident. It's outrageous when standards are not transparent. Who can play with peace of mind under these conditions? Instead of waiting to be labeled a BOT, it's better to focus on using the product properly. That's the right way. Rewards are gone and you still get slapped in the face. Why bother? A solid experience is the most reliable.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 11h ago

This standard of judgment is hidden and ambiguous. How are we supposed to play? It seems the project team hasn't even figured it out clearly themselves. Bots are running everywhere, but genuine users end up being affected. This logic is really absurd. Instead of guessing, it's better to just experience it firsthand. Anyway, whether there's a reward or not depends on the value of the product itself. The project team's approach is a bit crude; transparency is lacking. Honestly using the product is more reliable than blindly guessing the judgment standards. Both rewards and risk control are involved, so users have to figure out how to cross the river by feeling the stones.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterLucky

· 11h ago

Bots are everywhere, and the project team is playing the "Schrödinger's standard of judgment"? That's awkward. The probability of genuine users being mistakenly harmed is very high. It's better to spend more time thinking about the product itself and not be blinded by those registration rewards. Normal operations have become a scarce commodity, and that's the real opportunity.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e19e9c10

· 11h ago

The proliferation of bots is indeed annoying, but it's too much to deduct rewards without clearly explaining the standards by the project team. --- Instead of waiting to be hit by a major issue, it's better to just play genuinely. Anyway, I'm just wasting time anyway. --- That's why I never rely on "wool" (easy profits); using the product steadily is the real way. --- They don't even provide clear standards for judgment. Who dares to interact casually... It seems the project team hasn't thought it through either. --- Deep experience can indeed help avoid pitfalls, and sharing feedback is actually helping oneself. --- Why does it feel like all projects follow this routine now—first offering sugar, then dropping a bomb? --- You're right. Compared to those who chase rewards, people who genuinely explore the features are more likely to grasp the core of the project. --- I still think this opaque scoring mechanism has a bit of the East Asian "sick man of Asia" vibe. --- Then just use it honestly. Anyway, you can't cheat the product itself.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 11h ago

Bots are running everywhere, but the criteria for judgment are still a mystery. Isn't this just fishing... Instead of getting hacked and not knowing what's going on, it's better to just honestly use the product.

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 12h ago

There are so many bots, no wonder my rewards always feel like they're shrinking. They don't clearly explain the criteria, who would dare to play casually? It's better to honestly use the product; after all, real money feedback is the most valuable. How long can these speculators last this time, haha? Rather than guessing the rules, it's better to dive deep into the experience. By the way, have you guys discovered any hidden features?

View OriginalReply0