Privacy is a fundamental human right, not something that should be treated as complicit in wrongdoing. Yet here's the paradox: for digital finance to function at scale, we need auditability baked into the system.
So how do we split the difference? You can't just pick one and abandon the other.
This is exactly where selective disclosure comes in. Imagine a blockchain system that lets you prove transactions happened without exposing every detail to everyone watching. You reveal what matters for compliance, keep the rest private. It's not about hiding—it's about controlling what gets disclosed to whom.
Protocols like Miden are experimenting with this balance, building infrastructure where privacy and transparency aren't enemies. The tech allows users to maintain financial discretion while regulators and platforms get the audit trails they need.
The real innovation isn't choosing sides anymore. It's architecting systems where both privacy and accountability can coexist.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DogeBachelor
· 01-13 15:06
Honestly, the logic of selective disclosure sounds good, but whether it can be truly implemented is another matter...
Can privacy and regulation coexist perfectly? I remain skeptical. Let's see how Miden performs when it is truly adopted on a large scale.
These days, who still believes in "having it both ways"? Usually, it ends up pleasing no one.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 01-13 15:04
Good words, but in the end, who holds the discourse power determines the final outcome of this selective disclosure...
---
Miden sounds great, but how many projects can truly avoid being cut off? Just a risk reminder.
---
This is the eternal contradiction in the crypto world: privacy and transparency have always been a trade-off... Should have understood that long ago.
---
No matter how well the architecture is designed, it ultimately comes down to human nature; compliance audits often turn into power struggles.
---
So, there are countless technologies claiming to protect privacy, but none truly safeguard retail investors.
---
It sounds like a backdoor for regulators, just packaged more elegantly.
---
For your reference, these "perfectly balanced" solutions are mostly illusions.
---
You believe in selective disclosure, but I still trust charts to be more reliable...
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 01-13 15:03
ngl selective disclosure sounds good, just not sure if the regulators will really buy it...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecue
· 01-13 14:59
This selective disclosure sounds good, but can we really trust it... Will the regulators honestly only look at what they need?
Privacy is a fundamental human right, not something that should be treated as complicit in wrongdoing. Yet here's the paradox: for digital finance to function at scale, we need auditability baked into the system.
So how do we split the difference? You can't just pick one and abandon the other.
This is exactly where selective disclosure comes in. Imagine a blockchain system that lets you prove transactions happened without exposing every detail to everyone watching. You reveal what matters for compliance, keep the rest private. It's not about hiding—it's about controlling what gets disclosed to whom.
Protocols like Miden are experimenting with this balance, building infrastructure where privacy and transparency aren't enemies. The tech allows users to maintain financial discretion while regulators and platforms get the audit trails they need.
The real innovation isn't choosing sides anymore. It's architecting systems where both privacy and accountability can coexist.