2026-01-13 14:24:46

Recently, the ranking performance on two emerging projects has been quite good—Solstice is ranked 24th, and Xeet is 39th. It seems that the mechanism design is quite attractive: Solstice allocates 1% of the total supply to the top 100 participants, and this scarcity definitely helps boost enthusiasm. More interestingly, the market valuation expectation for Xeet is around $200M. Based on this logic, the size of the airdrop could reach a new high. If the community enthusiasm for both projects can be maintained, this profit opportunity is still worth looking forward to. However, the competition among the top 100 will definitely become more intense, and the advantage of early participants is gradually diminishing.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenDustCollector

· 18h ago

Top 100 positions? Man, the competition has long been intense and chaotic. I think trying to抢排名 (抢排名) is already outdated.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 01-13 14:54

What the top 100 positions look like now is quite competitive, to be honest, it's a bit exhausting.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBuffet

· 01-13 14:54

The top 100 positioning battle has already begun with fierce competition. It feels a bit late to enter now.

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 01-13 14:52

The top 100 have already merged together, and now entering just makes you cannon fodder... However, that $200M valuation for Xeet sounds pretty inflated.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 01-13 14:50

Early positioning indeed had its advantages, but now you have to hustle hard to get in.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainRetirementHome

· 01-13 14:43

The top 100 positions are really getting more competitive, and the early bird bonuses are shrinking day by day.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-13 14:39

According to the data in the white paper, Solstice's 1% distribution mechanism actually implicitly contains a serious incentive incompatibility issue... The observation that early participants' advantages diminish is valid, but fundamentally it is still the fatal flaw of tokenomics design.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWatcher