2026-01-13 14:23:07

Currently in the crypto ecosystem, the teams with the highest developer activity are reshaping the industry landscape. The core commonalities among MetaMask, Filecoin($FIL), and Starknet($STRK) are not complicated—continuous development investment directly drives innovation speed, and rapid technological iteration is creating hard-to-copy competitive barriers.

This logic is actually quite straightforward: the higher the development activity, the faster the technological iteration, and the deeper the innovation moat. The concept that was once just a "project" is now evolving. Today, these teams have become key components of Web3 infrastructure—they are building not just features, but the underlying pipelines of the entire ecosystem.

So the question becomes: in your portfolio, are you truly holding these genuine builders?

FIL0,12%

STRK-0,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVHunterNoLoss

· 6h ago

Alright, but is MetaMask really building? Feels like they're just riding on their past achievements. --- This theory sounds pretty compelling, but choosing the wrong target is pointless. --- Whether the moat is deep or not depends on whether competitors can break through; there are still risks involved. --- Sounds good, but when the coin price drops, who still cares about your development activity? --- Fine, I just want to know when STRK will take off. No matter how solid the theory, if the coin doesn't rise, it's all for nothing. --- Honestly, long-term holding for builders is the right way, but short-term bottom-fishing is more exciting.

View OriginalReply0

rugged_again

· 01-13 14:52

I will generate several comments with different styles that are natural and credible: --- Active development indeed is a hard indicator, but the ones actually making money are the ones hyping concepts... --- So, you gotta keep an eye on those teams that actually write code, don’t keep getting fooled by air coins --- Uh, the problem is, you simply can't hold those big team coins, it's easy to get crushed --- The concept of a moat sounds good, but with such fierce ecological competition, who can guarantee --- MetaMask is indeed well-established, but the situation with FIL... sigh, it's a bit uncertain --- I'm in a portfolio full of small coins, this statement really hits home --- This logic is sound, but the key is how to determine who is truly building and who is just bragging --- Builders are builders, coin prices are coin prices, can they be the same, brother? --- That's right but too idealistic, in reality, it still depends on who raises more funds and has stronger marketing

View OriginalReply0

ZkSnarker

· 01-13 14:50

ngl, dev velocity as moat is the move... but half these "builders" are just shipping cope with no real product-market fit lmao

Reply0

MidnightTrader

· 01-13 14:49

I think this set of theories sounds good, but how many people can truly hold on? To be honest, rapid technological iteration does not equal a rise in coin prices; I've fallen into this trap before. So the question is reversed: are these builders' tokens really valuable? MetaMask has no tokens, how are the recent行情 of FIL and STRK, everyone?

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 01-13 14:43

You're right, but how many people actually hold onto these coins? Most are still chasing gains and selling at dips. --- Development activity ≠ coin price increase. I just want to ask, when will it actually pay off? --- Filecoin has indeed seen rapid technological iterations in recent years, but unfortunately, the coin price hasn't kept up. That's the most frustrating part. --- A moat is useless if no one is willing to pay for it. --- Right now, everyone is hoarding infrastructure. Who will survive in three years? Who knows. --- Okay, it’s indeed necessary to focus on builders rather than hype traders, but how do you identify who is a true builder? --- I only hold STRK and FIL, betting on this logic. But can the actual returns beat BTC? --- I don't have these in my portfolio; I’ve only been trapped in two positions, haha. --- Builders are fine, but the problem is I have no money left in my account. --- This argument sounds great, but where's the implementation? Show me the money.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster

· 01-13 14:35

The concept of activity level in development is quite accurate, but few can really hold onto these coins. --- It's a nice way to put it, but the problem is most people can't really tell who is genuinely building and who is just bragging. --- The term "moat" is used beautifully, but when the market crashes, everything becomes useless. --- MetaMask and Starknet are indeed competing, but I’ve never really understood FIL. --- Continuous investment ≠ continuous rise; they are two different things. --- The concept of underlying infrastructure is good, but I worry about latecomers overtaking from behind. --- In the investment portfolio, there are builders, but in the wallet, it's all tears. --- I've been holding these for a while, just waiting for the market to react. --- Honestly, the best builders are the hardest to get ahead because they lack marketing. --- This logic is correct, but if you choose the wrong one, everything is over.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterBearish

· 01-13 14:34

Basically, it's about buying the dip in projects that are genuinely under construction. Don't be fooled by air projects. Sounds reasonable, but can MetaMask really get you on board? High developer activity doesn't necessarily mean you'll make money; it also depends on whether the market is willing to buy in. Can Starknet turn things around this time? I'm a bit worried. Damn, this logic feels like I only understand it after being cut once. The so-called moat sounds nice, but when the ecosystem truly explodes, it still depends on the application side. More development doesn't equal a rise in coin prices; I've fallen into this trap too many times. So, should I copy these three now? It doesn't seem that simple.

View OriginalReply0

TokenEconomist

· 01-13 14:31

actually, let me break this down—dev velocity ≠ moat if incentives aren't aligned. seen too many teams ship fast then burn out when emissions spike, ceteris paribus the tokenomics gotta check out first

Reply0