Hello everyone, today let's discuss a topic that many people are paying close attention to: how can the decentralized storage field break through?



Frankly speaking, the core contradiction in this track has never been about "whether storage is possible," but rather about balancing three dimensions—cost, recoverability, and anti-malicious behavior. Achieving all three simultaneously? Easier said than done.

Copy data completely? Excellent stability, but the cost is so high that it makes you question life. Traditional one-dimensional erasure coding schemes (like Reed-Solomon) have brought prices down, which is true, but problems also follow: if nodes frequently go offline in your network environment—which is common in real-world applications—restoring a data fragment requires re-downloading and recalculating the entire file. Bandwidth? Explodes. Time? Also explodes. User experience? Even more so.

Walrus's approach is different. They don't intend to choose between cheap and reliable as an either/or option. Instead, they decided to redesign the underlying coding logic, enabling the system to inherently possess self-healing capabilities. The core of this solution is called RedStuff.

According to official documentation, RedStuff is a custom erasure coding scheme developed by Walrus, based on the mathematical foundation of "efficient and computable Reed-Solomon codes," while achieving three key properties: systematization, determinism, and high efficiency.

What does systematization mean? Simply put, the data received by some storage nodes isn't a scrambled or encrypted fragment, but a direct slice of the original data. The practical benefit is clear: common operations like random reads and range queries no longer require full decoding each time, significantly improving performance.

Determinism guarantees security from another perspective. The encoding process for the same data has no "human freedom"—regardless of who encodes or when it is encoded, the result must be exactly the same. This effectively prevents nodes from maliciously tampering with data through "creative operations" during encoding.

And those two eye-catching numbers further illustrate the point: Walrus's system only needs about one-third of the redundancy to reach the security threshold, and during data repair, it can reduce the computational load by approximately three times compared to traditional schemes. In other words, under the same security guarantees, costs are lower, and speed is faster.

The brilliance of this approach lies in its not optimizing along a single dimension but fundamentally improving the entire system's efficiency boundary by changing the organization of the underlying coding. In the path of decentralized storage, such architectural-level innovation is often more valuable than mere engineering optimizations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DecentralizedEldervip
· 01-13 14:51
RedStuff's move is truly brilliant. It revamped the erasure coding from the ground up, saving costs without dropping the ball. Walrus has finally found the right balance this time.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPapervip
· 01-13 14:50
Damn, if RedStuff can really cut redundancy by one-third... I need to get on board quickly, or I'll be FOMOing to the point of vomiting blood. Wait, are these numbers just another PPT myth, and the actual implementation is a different story?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorkervip
· 01-13 14:49
The idea of RedStuff is indeed interesting, but actually running the economic model is the key, right? --- Honestly, saving three times the computation sounds great, but I'm worried it might still fall into the old problem of malicious nodes. --- Haha, reducing redundancy by one-third sounds wonderful, but whether it can be practically deployed is another matter. --- The architectural innovation is good, but how long Walrus can survive is what I care about, after all, how many projects have failed in this space. --- We've all stepped into the pitfalls of the Reed-Solomon scheme. Is Walrus's deterministic guarantee really reliable or just marketing? --- Performance improvement by an order of magnitude—I've heard this many times. Are there actual test data? --- But to be fair, redesigning the underlying coding approach is indeed different from others, worth following up. --- Reducing computation by three times and saving bandwidth too? If that's true, decentralized storage might really have a shot. --- The core issue is still trust; no matter how good the technical solution is, nodes need to be willing to participate. --- RedStuff is a good name, but I don't know how active the community is.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 01-13 14:47
RedStuff sounds good in theory, but whether it actually works well when launched remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomadvip
· 01-13 14:36
RedStuff's logic is truly excellent; finally, someone has broken through from the coding level.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)