As one of the early supporters, our initial goal was simple — to combat the unhealthy trend of treating everything as a token for speculation.



The project representative, as a main promoter, has experienced endless attacks and defamation from people holding certain tokens. Honestly, those tactics and methods are very similar to some of the current situations we see.

The difference is that this representative has not stopped learning and accumulating over the years. From completing advanced degrees to continuously enhancing their understanding, they now have the ability to handle various challenges. Those old tricks that once worked are now ineffective for builders who continue to grow. This is probably the meaning of the ecosystem growing together with its people.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHerovip
· 22h ago
Honestly, this routine has really been played out in the crypto world. After comparing and comparing, it's still the same old tricks. It all depends on who can settle down and genuinely build.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 01-13 14:50
ngl, the "old playbook stops working" bit is interesting... technically speaking though, requires further auditing whether the defensive posture here actually holds up under stress-tested conditions. seen too many builders claim immunity before getting hit with vectors they didn't anticipate.
Reply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 01-13 14:50
Those who entered early understand that chaos. Now this brother has truly settled down, unlike some who shout slogans every day. He also earned his degree, his understanding has improved, and the tricks definitely don't work on him anymore haha
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 01-13 14:50
From on-chain data, the retention rate of early supporters indeed reflects the project's resilience. It is worth noting that teams that can continue building after experiencing FUD typically possess stronger risk adaptation capabilities—such indicators can deviate by over 60% in historical backtests.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 01-13 14:40
The early group indeed withstood a lot of pressure, but to be honest, this set of public opinion tactics is still being used now, which makes it a bit low-level. Growth is indeed very important, but there are many armchair builders in the circle; few can truly bear the weight and continue iterating. If the resilience is strong enough, they can naturally ignore those noises. The problem is that most project teams lack this kind of perseverance.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMOvip
· 01-13 14:35
This is the true builder, unlike some people who only know how to ride the hype and issue tokens every day.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)