#策略性加码BTC Looking at the position of ASTER, we need to consider the holding cost of a certain leading institution's founder. The chips bought at 0.91U were once pushed up to 1.2U, and now it has fallen back to around 0.7U.
From a game theory perspective, this price point is quite interesting. The early investors' costs are sitting there, and increasing their positions again would clearly indicate a change in attitude. There is still room for imagination in terms of space and sentiment, but it depends on how the market develops later.
Getting back to the main point—it's very tempting to see big funds entering, but risk management is the foundation for survival. Position planning, stop-loss settings, and other strategies should be thought out in advance. Chasing the market and panic selling are always the fast tracks to losing money.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
defi_detective
· 1h ago
At a price of $0.7, if the big institutions move their chips again, it will be a show to watch.
---
Position management is really the key; this is the line between life and death. Don't get blinded by the coin price.
---
The game theory part is indeed interesting, but I still think we should wait for signals before making a move.
---
Stop-loss is easy to talk about but hard to do; many people have been wiped out simply because they didn't set this line properly.
---
With a cost basis of 0.91 early on, if I really add positions at this level, I’ll assume they are optimistic about the future market.
---
I've seen many chasing the rally, and in the end, they all end up losing everything. You need to learn to wait for the right opportunity.
---
For ASTER, there is indeed room on the emotional side, but the key is to see how it develops later.
---
Risk management is correct; those who have died in the crypto circle are usually those who didn't plan their positions.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 01-13 14:31
0.7 is indeed an interesting price, but I'm still hesitant. I'll wait until the big players really start investing before making a move.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 01-13 14:31
0.7U this price does have some value, but I'll still wait and see how the big players move. Don't end up becoming the bagholder later.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 01-13 14:15
The 0.7 price point is indeed tempting, but I'll wait and see what the big players do first, afraid of getting cut.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 01-13 14:05
0.7 is really stuck, waiting for the big players to make moves.
#策略性加码BTC Looking at the position of ASTER, we need to consider the holding cost of a certain leading institution's founder. The chips bought at 0.91U were once pushed up to 1.2U, and now it has fallen back to around 0.7U.
From a game theory perspective, this price point is quite interesting. The early investors' costs are sitting there, and increasing their positions again would clearly indicate a change in attitude. There is still room for imagination in terms of space and sentiment, but it depends on how the market develops later.
Getting back to the main point—it's very tempting to see big funds entering, but risk management is the foundation for survival. Position planning, stop-loss settings, and other strategies should be thought out in advance. Chasing the market and panic selling are always the fast tracks to losing money.