Predicted market traders face a $2.36M liquidation within 8 days—what's behind this?
The performance looks decent—47% win rate, 25 wins against 28 losses. But there's a hidden killer: each bet ranges from $200k to over $1M, with no hedging protection. When profitable, single trades can yield 60% to 150%, but once a mistake happens, it's an instant wipeout.
A few large losses are enough to destroy everything. This is not a luck issue but a complete collapse of risk management.
Even the strongest trading instincts can't withstand such betting methods. Confidence alone isn't enough; it must be paired with a risk control system. Relying solely on win rate and mindset? That's not trading, that's gambling. This is why some people earn 60% but still end up empty-handed.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektButAlive
· 01-14 05:27
This is a typical case of "making quick gains and losing even faster." No matter how good your mindset is, it can't save an account without risk control.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 01-14 00:30
This guy is the typical "win and party, lose and be done," trading without risk control is just gambling with your life.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 01-13 14:31
This is a typical gambler's mentality, treating trading as an all-in game.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 01-13 14:24
It's the same old trick again—going all in and thinking you're a trader, but in the end, you're still just a gambler.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 01-13 14:17
This guy just hasn't learned the Kelly criterion. Going all-in might make you money, but you're not far from liquidation.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 01-13 14:14
The classic Kelly formula paradox: the win rate looks good, but the position management completely collapses. That's why I always say relying solely on mentality is nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
PumpBeforeRug
· 01-13 14:12
This guy just doesn't take risk management seriously; he's just gambling.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 01-13 14:06
Another all-in veteran, a typical gambler's mentality disguised as a trader. A 47% win rate and still daring to place single bets of millions—this isn't confidence, it's courting death.
Predicted market traders face a $2.36M liquidation within 8 days—what's behind this?
The performance looks decent—47% win rate, 25 wins against 28 losses. But there's a hidden killer: each bet ranges from $200k to over $1M, with no hedging protection. When profitable, single trades can yield 60% to 150%, but once a mistake happens, it's an instant wipeout.
A few large losses are enough to destroy everything. This is not a luck issue but a complete collapse of risk management.
Even the strongest trading instincts can't withstand such betting methods. Confidence alone isn't enough; it must be paired with a risk control system. Relying solely on win rate and mindset? That's not trading, that's gambling. This is why some people earn 60% but still end up empty-handed.