It's been a long time since I systematically wrote about prediction markets. One reason is that the voices in this space are too noisy, with big words like "truth machine" and "ultimate solution" coming out of every mouth, which gets a bit tiresome. Another reason is that it's too easy to get caught up in details—debating how to set the order book for 15 minutes, how a data dashboard on a certain platform displays information, then both sides stick to their guns, arguing for a long time without any conclusion, which just wastes time.
However, recently I came across some forward-looking analyses about the crypto market in 2026, and some of their viewpoints are indeed worth pondering. Short-term order book battles and data benchmarking might not be that valuable after all. Instead, perspectives that step out of daily K-line charts and look at longer-term trends are more helpful in understanding where prediction markets are really headed.
Rather than spending energy arguing over today's detailed data, it's better to think about possible changes in this space next year or the year after. The underlying logic of prediction markets, user psychology, and policy environment—these slow variables—are the real factors that determine the direction. With this way of thinking, discussions become clearer and more structured, rather than each side talking past each other.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DisillusiionOracle
· 10h ago
That's right, the prediction market crowd is always shouting about the truth machine, which gives me a headache.
This thing depends on cycles; short-term market data is meaningless.
Changes in 2026 are worth paying attention to; a policy shift can cause chaos worldwide.
Debating details is a waste of life; the framework is the answer.
Once the basic logic is understood, everything else is superficial.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collector
· 01-14 12:10
Indeed, constantly watching the market is really a waste of life.
---
Long-term thinking is the winning mindset; short-term data is too noisy.
---
That's right, predicting the market now is each fighting their own battle; no one wants to analyze the big picture.
---
The policy environment is the core variable; everything else is just clouds.
---
I like this approach; a re-evaluation in 2026 will be clearer.
---
The game of details is really annoying; someone always insists on arguing about K-lines.
---
Underlying logic is what determines the height; that's correct.
---
To truly revive the market, we still need to wait for policy relaxation.
---
I dislike those marketing pitches about "ultimate solutions"; they've gone too far.
---
Long-term perspective can really see through the tricks; short-term is all about emotions.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweeper
· 01-13 14:10
nah most prediction market takes are just paper hands coping... the real alpha's always in the macro thesis nobody's paying attention to yet
Reply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-13 14:05
Wake up, wake up, finally someone said it. Listening to those market prediction bragging every day is really annoying.
Well said. Instead of obsessing over whether it drops or rises today, it's better to think carefully about what will remain in 2026.
Slow variables are the core; when policies change, the game changes entirely. This logic doesn't hold up.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpert
· 01-13 14:03
It should have been said like this earlier. Getting caught up in the details of the daily chart is really brainless.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTalker
· 01-13 13:47
Actually, this hits different ngl... everyone's out here screaming "oracle of truth" when really they're just watching 15min candles like it's a sport. The slow variables angle? Yeah, that's where the real signal is buried beneath all the noise.
It's been a long time since I systematically wrote about prediction markets. One reason is that the voices in this space are too noisy, with big words like "truth machine" and "ultimate solution" coming out of every mouth, which gets a bit tiresome. Another reason is that it's too easy to get caught up in details—debating how to set the order book for 15 minutes, how a data dashboard on a certain platform displays information, then both sides stick to their guns, arguing for a long time without any conclusion, which just wastes time.
However, recently I came across some forward-looking analyses about the crypto market in 2026, and some of their viewpoints are indeed worth pondering. Short-term order book battles and data benchmarking might not be that valuable after all. Instead, perspectives that step out of daily K-line charts and look at longer-term trends are more helpful in understanding where prediction markets are really headed.
Rather than spending energy arguing over today's detailed data, it's better to think about possible changes in this space next year or the year after. The underlying logic of prediction markets, user psychology, and policy environment—these slow variables—are the real factors that determine the direction. With this way of thinking, discussions become clearer and more structured, rather than each side talking past each other.