When choosing investment targets, I still lean towards this direction. Don't ask me why I didn't allocate to another one—once that thing goes live, it becomes a short-term liquidation, with a lot of floating capital. I have to admit that the mechanism design of that project is indeed good, but the problem is that the holders are too dispersed. Once someone dumps, the entire position becomes deeply trapped. Instead of chasing seemingly perfect designs, it's better to choose assets with stable liquidity and relatively solid trading volume. This is my investment logic—defensive strategies tend to be more valuable in a bear market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SellLowExpert
· 01-14 00:11
Bear markets are for survival; don't mess around with those flashy things that seem tempting... A pile of floating capital is really disgusting.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420
· 01-13 14:05
Well said. No matter how awesome the mechanism is, if there's a lot of floating capital, it will still die. That's also what I think.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbie
· 01-13 13:52
Projects with a lot of floating supply are really risky; a single hit can wipe them out completely. It's better to choose stable projects and play it safe.
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperer
· 01-13 13:45
During a bear market, you need to stay steady. Don't be fooled by flashy mechanisms; things with a lot of floating capital can disappear with a single hit.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69
· 01-13 13:36
Projects with a large amount of floating supply are indeed more vulnerable to being hammered down; I have deep experience with that. Defensive positions are indeed more resistant to hits.
When choosing investment targets, I still lean towards this direction. Don't ask me why I didn't allocate to another one—once that thing goes live, it becomes a short-term liquidation, with a lot of floating capital. I have to admit that the mechanism design of that project is indeed good, but the problem is that the holders are too dispersed. Once someone dumps, the entire position becomes deeply trapped. Instead of chasing seemingly perfect designs, it's better to choose assets with stable liquidity and relatively solid trading volume. This is my investment logic—defensive strategies tend to be more valuable in a bear market.