2026-01-13 13:29:47

The community's stance is clear here—this is what collective consensus looks like. When the majority agrees it's time to move on from a project, that's when real governance happens. It's the community that ultimately decides which projects thrive and which don't.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UnruggableChad

· 9h ago

Basically, it's the Gresham's Law in action—bad money drives out good money. The tyranny of the majority is just as prevalent in crypto.

View OriginalReply0

RektButSmiling

· 01-13 13:59

This is what Web3 should look like; community decision-making is true governance.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBouncer

· 01-13 13:59

What can community voting change? Isn't it just the big players calling the shots?

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 01-13 13:57

The replacement of on-chain civilization ultimately comes down to human will. Just like the silence of ancient ruins, it often begins with collective silence.

View OriginalReply0

tokenomics_truther

· 01-13 13:46

Basically, it's whoever has the loudest voice that gets to decide. Is that called consensus? I think, actually, most people haven't thought it through clearly.

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-13 13:43

That's correct, but the real issue is that sometimes the majority opinion is manipulated by a few big players.

View OriginalReply0