2026-01-13 13:29:36

Recently, I have clearly felt a change in the community: MemeMax is no longer just a trending topic, but has started to develop its own lifecycle. You will find that participants' mindsets have completely changed — no longer just following the trend of buying and selling, but truly analyzing the underlying mathematics.

Is opening blind boxes worth it? Should I now push for the leaderboard? Should I use the MP tokens I hold immediately or hold onto them for the next phase? Today’s collected transaction fees for buyback, are they enough to cover my participation costs? These questions are now being seriously calculated by some people. This shift is very interesting — from pure speculation to rational analysis of the mechanism itself.

MP1,24%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoHistoryClass

· 16h ago

ngl, this is exactly where projects start lying to themselves. seen this pattern before—2017, 2021, literally every cycle. ppl think "doing the math" means they've found the edge, but statistically speaking? that's just capitulation dressed up as due diligence. the math only matters if the game isn't rigged from day one lol

Reply0

NoodlesOrTokens

· 01-14 01:57

Honestly, I was a bit surprised that this wave of people started calculating accounts. Before, it was all just following the herd mentality. Can transaction fee buyback cover costs? It depends on the scenario; it still seems to rely on luck. Got it. Now, there are actually people studying this matter, not just talking nonsense. As for the leaderboard, whether to go for it or not depends on how much you can afford to lose. This change is indeed a bit interesting, but don't get too carried away. I just want to know, what can calculating accounts really reveal? In the end, it still depends on the market conditions.

View OriginalReply0

NftDeepBreather

· 01-13 13:59

To be honest, I can see this shift in mindset — from purely relying on luck to now analyzing data, which is quite interesting. But can the accounts in the blind box really be calculated clearly? I find it more and more confusing the more I try. Is MP being sold today or held tightly? It seems like some are making money while others are losing, with luck playing a big role. I need to revisit the buyback of transaction fees; I didn't quite understand the logic before. Finally, it's no longer just about chasing gains and selling in panic; this is more like the community should be—warm and engaging.

View OriginalReply0

StableGenius

· 01-13 13:59

ngl the math doesn't actually check out the way these guys think it does... but sure, let's pretend retail figured out tokenomics overnight lol

Reply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 01-13 13:56

ngl the math checks out but everyone's still lying about their bags, the fee mechanics are just dressed-up ponzi algebra if you ask me

Reply0

LonelyAnchorman

· 01-13 13:55

Really, now more and more people in the community are doing accounting, but I still think most people don't understand... That broken MP buyback mechanism, waiting for the next phase? Dream on, buddy.

View OriginalReply0

ImaginaryWhale

· 01-13 13:52

Oh, now this is what playing with coins is all about, isn't it? Starting to tally up, this wave is really different. I've repeatedly analyzed MP's buyback logic, and it's quite interesting. The leaderboard is a pit that needs to be waited on; you can't rush hot tofu. From chasing price rises and falls to looking at the math, why bother? It should have been like this all along. The blind box cost-performance ratio is really terrible right now. The more I look at this mechanism, the more complicated it becomes. Has anyone really figured it out? Holding on and waiting for the next phase feels more stable.

View OriginalReply0