2026-01-13 13:26:12

There is a deeply ingrained misconception in the market — the belief that important assets must be mined at the hottest moments. In fact, it's the other way around. Truly long-term valuable infrastructure projects are often quietly built during times when the market is least interested in discussing "value."

A typical signal in the later stages of a cycle is not a crash, but "exhaustion from excitement." The same story has been told ten times, and no one is excited anymore. At this point, you'll notice a change in some projects' Twitter style — they no longer bother explaining price movements or playing emotional narratives. Walrus Protocol's recent content is exactly like this. It repeatedly emphasizes only a few facts: data volume is growing, chain processing efficiency for this data is too low, and Web3 needs truly reliable decentralized storage.

This is not some future speculation. It is happening now. When a project repeatedly returns to the fundamental question of "does the problem itself exist," it indicates that it has thoroughly shed the burden of short-term speculation.

The most common misunderstanding about infrastructure projects is here — many people evaluate "supporting logic" using "explosive growth logic." They expect rapid user surges, clear price feedback, and dramatic narratives. But the value of infrastructure is never calculated by "explosion," but by "irreplaceable" and "cannot be bypassed." Walrus's role is not to excite people, but to ensure the entire system continues to operate normally in places you can't even notice.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 9h ago

Well said, that's why most people will never make real money. They are all staring at price charts, ignoring the infrastructure. --- Infrastructure is like a sewer; no one wants to talk about it but can't do without it. --- The concept of excitement fatigue is brilliant, it fully explains why I no longer react to new tokens. --- Walrus actually makes me more interested. Projects that only tell the truth without hype are still rare. --- "Unavoidable" vs "Explosive Logic," this is a fundamental difference in thinking. Most of the market is still playing with the latter. --- Really, watching the change in a project's Twitter style is much more useful than reading the whitepaper. A change in mindset means everything has changed. --- Wait, can this logic be applied to the storage layer of the Solana ecosystem? It seems like these invisible infrastructures are the most imaginative right now. --- No wonder I can't understand these projects and am still waiting for concept hype. I need to change my approach. --- Decentralized storage has always been a pseudo-need; the real demand shouldn't be that high. --- That's why the last phase of a cycle is the easiest to pick up gems, provided you can hold through the boredom.

View OriginalReply0

SerRugResistant

· 01-13 13:56

To be honest, real infrastructure is like this. It’s only when it looks the most boring that it’s the most valuable. --- This analysis hits the point. Infrastructure projects should work silently. --- I’ve noticed Walrus’s recent shift; they definitely aren’t hyping concepts anymore. --- The phrase "market 'excitement fatigue'" is brilliant — it’s only when you can’t push the value story that the real opportunity appears. --- The hard part is that most people can’t even reach that stage; their mindset collapses first. --- Carrying logic vs. explosive logic — this is the standard for distinguishing who is truly building. --- Watching project Twitter shift from storytelling to presenting facts — that’s definitely a signal. --- The gap in Web3 storage was always there; it’s not something made up. --- It’s really about whether you can accept half a year without an "emotional高潮." --- The most annoying thing about infrastructure is that it’s easily seen as "air that no one wants." In fact, the more boring it is, the more valuable it becomes.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSkeptic

· 01-13 13:55

You're right, over the past two years, projects that relied on daily hot topics have all died out. Truly valuable infrastructure is about quietly making big profits. Infrastructure is about being able to endure loneliness; otherwise, how can it be called infrastructure? Compared to those relying on stories, it's on a completely different level. This is the correct way to approach it. Not hyping up popularity can actually be more solid. I'm stunned, many people are still waiting for an explosive growth curve. Infrastructure isn't about this kind of gameplay at all. It seems this is why many people miss out on real opportunities—they are too easily hijacked by FOMO. Honestly, projects with real value don't need to bother telling stories; just do the work. This kind of mindset gap is the real money-making opportunity. When others are impatient, it's the perfect time for low-key development.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamBreaker

· 01-13 13:55

Infrastructure projects are always severely underestimated That's so true. Most people are still waiting for the story of a sudden surge, not realizing that the real money has already been accumulated long before anyone paid attention. Walrus, which quietly does its work, is truly terrifying. Not hyping it up makes it even more worth following. The value of such projects doesn't lie in the narrative but in the fact that once they become necessities, no one can bypass them. Infrastructure is boring but reliable. That's why the real alpha has always been hidden in the most dull corners. No hype, no blackening. Just ask: who is really using it? Who is just hyping concepts?

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 01-13 13:32

ngl this hits different. everyone's chasing the hype cycle while real infrastructure compounds silently in the background. walrus doing exactly what boring protocols should do—solve actual inefficiencies instead of chasing narratives. that's the asymmetric return vector most retail completely misses.

Reply0

RugpullTherapist

· 01-13 13:31

You're absolutely right, most people are just chasing hot topics The truly good things are often in overlooked corners Walrus is the one to watch, quietly doing its work Infrastructure doesn't need storytelling, it needs to be functional The market's favorite is often the most superficial This round, it's becoming clearer and clearer

View OriginalReply0