In the past two years, complaints like "Someone stole my X years" have been especially popular in the community, and recently it was Base's turn.



A founder of a blockchain game team shared their experience. Three years ago, they decided to develop on Base, full of anticipation. "We will fully support your development"—this was the initial promise they received. But reality was harsh: investment, waiting, disappointment—the cycle just kept stretching out.

The turning point came when they decided to switch to Solana. The same product, but with a different blockchain ecosystem, saw a sharply rising growth curve. This contrast was very striking—it's not a product problem, but the difference in ecosystem dividends.

This story reflects that: the level of support from developers and the activity of the ecosystem indeed vary greatly across different public chains. For early-stage projects, choosing a truly active and developer-supportive blockchain might be more critical than the product itself.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)