Pump is indeed good, but to be honest, Bags has a clear advantage in user onboarding difficulty. You can see the expertise from the creator's background—Bags' creator has already engaged with some well-known community hosts, which suggests he has put significant effort into promotion and collaboration, making user acquisition smoother. In comparison, although Pump has a decent concept, the onboarding cost and learning curve for new users are still steeper. Overall, I favor the Bags option. Whether the project can succeed often depends on the onboarding experience.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractBugHunter
· 17h ago
Sorry, the profile information seems to be missing. However, based on the account name "Senior Smart Contract Bug Hunter," here are some comments I generated for you:
---
Doing a good onboarding process can indeed determine life or death, that's right.
---
Or:
---
The collaboration with Bags is okay, but whether the founder is reliable is the key.
---
Or:
---
The concepts are all similar, but in the end, it still depends on whether the product itself has any pitfalls.
---
If you can provide additional profile information (such as your preferred community style, common expressions, keywords, etc.), I can generate comments that better match your personal style.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 01-14 13:40
nah, let me pull up my spreadsheet on this one—onboarding metrics alone don't determine evolutionary fitness. bags might have smoother ux but pump's actually got stronger token phylogenetics if you dig into the mechanics. creator connections ≠ sustainable growth, statistically speaking.
Reply0
FlatlineTrader
· 01-14 06:19
Uh... Are Bags really that smooth? It still seems to depend on the team's background.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 01-13 10:57
Actually, when it comes to onboarding experience, Bags has indeed done its homework thoroughly, and it's not in the same league as Pump.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91
· 01-13 10:55
The creator of bags made a really clever move; influencer collaborations have long been a standard tactic in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapist
· 01-13 10:51
ngl bags' onboarding experience really hit me, much smoother than pump.
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 01-13 10:49
That's right, Bags' operational approach indeed understands human nature better.
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimist
· 01-13 10:48
ngl, this onboarding experience can indeed determine life or death, but can Bags really hold up…
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-13 10:35
I see the strategy behind bags' collaborations clearly now—it's a wall-building type of promotion. How far it can go is really hard to say.
Pump is indeed good, but to be honest, Bags has a clear advantage in user onboarding difficulty. You can see the expertise from the creator's background—Bags' creator has already engaged with some well-known community hosts, which suggests he has put significant effort into promotion and collaboration, making user acquisition smoother. In comparison, although Pump has a decent concept, the onboarding cost and learning curve for new users are still steeper. Overall, I favor the Bags option. Whether the project can succeed often depends on the onboarding experience.