2026-01-13 08:32:30

The global supply chain is undergoing a restructuring. The United States is building a "de-Chinese-ized" supply chain system through tariffs and incentives—imposing a 25% tariff on Iran-related business, while establishing a "Silicon-based Peace" cooperation framework with Gulf countries and India to promote the decentralization of the rare earth industry. These measures include coordinated actions by the G7 in the rare earth sector and trade agreements with Taiwan (purely geopolitical signals).

This supply chain reorganization is reshaping the global business landscape. For traders focused on macro trends, these policy shifts hint at long-term changes in the economic landscape—from a shift from globalized division of labor to geopolitical bloc formation, directly affecting the performance of commodities, energy, and technology stocks, and subsequently impacting overall asset allocation strategies. Uncertainty in trade policies continues to rise, and markets are still digesting the effects of these structural changes.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

mev_me_maybe

· 9h ago

De-Sinicization of the supply chain? That's hilarious. Uncle Sam is playing with fire. Costs are going to skyrocket.

View OriginalReply0

NFTBlackHole

· 13h ago

Damn, here we go with the decoupling playbook again. No matter how you dress it up, it's all just geopolitical chess. This rare earth positioning move is brutal though—splitting the supply chain into two camps pretty much kills any hope of globalization as we know it. Bullish on energy and tech stocks for the opportunities, but trade war is far from over.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurnerSociety

· 01-13 09:02

Damn, another round of supply chain reshuffling. My contract positions are probably going to be wiped out. Geopolitical camp polarization? Doesn't that mean we have to start bottom-fishing again? The professional leek is already in position. Rare earth decentralization... Wait, did I just fall into a trap again with the last all-in on rare earth concept stocks? This wave of uncertainty is basically my liquidation price indicator. The stable loss strategy continues to prove effective. "Silicon-based peace"? So my tech stock holdings are going to be re-evaluated with negative alpha? That's interesting.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 01-13 09:02

ngl the de-risking narrative is just arbitrage theater... real money's already frontrunning the rare earth reshuffling, watch cross-chain correlations on commodity indices

Reply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-13 09:00

According to research, the essence of this wave of supply chain restructuring is a typical case of geopolitical economics—data shows that the cost of decentralizing rare earths is over 30% higher, which cannot be made up in the short term. It is worth noting that from a technical perspective, the "Silicon-based Peace" framework sounds impressive, but actual capacity integration will take at least 5-10 years, and the market is currently overreacting. Based on the following points: the transmission mechanism of tariff policies has a lag, the repricing on the asset side has not fully manifested, especially in the tech stocks, where risk release is still insufficient. It is recommended not to be fooled by short-term fluctuations and to calmly focus on the fundamentals.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 01-13 08:53

Non-Chinese supply chains are just disguising a new Cold War under the guise of free markets; ultimately, it's a geopolitical利益 game. --- Rare earth decentralization? Haha, this move is too obvious, and the costs will be passed on to end consumers. --- Increasing tariffs and trade barriers are truly hurting small and medium-sized enterprises on multinational supply chains; major players have already hedged against this. --- The term "Silicon-based Peace" is really just a show; isn't it just the US and India jointly restricting Chinese technology? --- I'm optimistic about trading opportunities in the energy and rare earth sectors; uncertainty has actually created alpha space. --- The trend of supply chain localization is already locked in; in the next three to five years, many structural opportunities will emerge. --- This wave of US actions is nothing but an attempt to "de-risk" and is actually leveraging geopolitical bets. --- Wait, could this adjustment make India and Vietnam's manufacturing industries the real winners? --- It takes time for the market to digest structural changes; short-term volatility is high, but the direction is very clear. --- In plain terms, globalization is reversing, and this car will only go slower and slower.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-13 08:47

Hmm, this move by the US is really playing a big chess game. Decoupling the supply chain from China is basically just swapping eggs for a basket—can it succeed? Rare earths are definitely set to take off. Those who have laid out early are probably laughing to death. Using geopolitical issues as chips, we retail investors can only follow the trend and speculate—it's a bit helpless. Tariff barriers are becoming increasingly absurd. In the short term, commodities might fluctuate for a while. The silicon-based peace framework sounds sophisticated, but it's really just a new version of factional division—nothing new. It's good that India and Gulf countries are rising, otherwise the global supply chain lifeline would be in the hands of a single country—too dangerous. Rather than reconstruction, it's more like a new Cold War. The market will become more and more fragmented. After this round of adjustments, how should I allocate my tech stocks? I'm a bit confused. Looks like I need to reassess my investment portfolio. Geopolitical risks are no longer just risks—they're the norm. Trade uncertainties are rising; holding cash and waiting might be the right move.

View OriginalReply0

fomo_fighter

· 01-13 08:32

To be honest, this move by the US is really about shedding dependence on China, but can India and the Gulf countries really step up? Rare earths are not that simple.

View OriginalReply0