The Ledger platform has just launched its new multisignature interface, a much-anticipated solution to enhance the security of hardware wallets. However, this technically solid innovation faces a backlash regarding its pricing policy, raising questions about its ethical stance within the crypto ecosystem.
The Pricing Controversy: A Debated Structure
The Ledger Multisig application applies a two-tier billing model: a fixed fee of $10 per transaction, supplemented by an additional 0.05% fee on token transfers. These costs are added to the usual blockchain network fees, significantly increasing the final bill for users. This pricing approach sharply contrasts with the initial promises made by the French giant, creating palpable frustration within the community.
Critical Voices Rise
Renowned Ethereum ecosystem developer, pcaversaccio, did not hold back, calling this strategy a “racket,” and arguing that it diverts users from the decentralized and sovereign principles that underpin the cypherpunk philosophy. This criticism carries particular weight because it comes from a technically respected figure, amplifying discomfort around this commercial decision.
The embarrassment was compounded by contradictory statements from CEO Charles Guillemet, who initially claimed that the multisig service would be free. When asked about this discrepancy, he later attributed the confusing communication to a simple textual error. This communication blunder fueled suspicions about Ledger’s true transparency.
Ledger Maintains Its Dominance Despite Controversy
Despite this reputation turmoil, Ledger remains a key player in the crypto hardware storage solutions market. With over 7.5 million devices sold, the company secures about one-fifth of the global digital asset value. This market dominance gives Ledger considerable decision-making power, although the recent controversy reveals the limits of its popularity.
The Double Challenge: Convenience and Security
Ledger hardware wallets offer exceptional protection against conventional attack vectors, but cybersecurity experts remind that the multisignature interface does not completely eliminate threats. Targeted phishing and social engineering techniques can still compromise the multi-signature chain, even on the most fortified devices.
This controversy surrounding Ledger Multisig illustrates the tension between technological innovation and commercial sustainability, forcing the crypto community to question the true cost of decentralized security.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Ledger Multisig triggers a pricing controversy: users and developers challenge the compensation model
The Ledger platform has just launched its new multisignature interface, a much-anticipated solution to enhance the security of hardware wallets. However, this technically solid innovation faces a backlash regarding its pricing policy, raising questions about its ethical stance within the crypto ecosystem.
The Pricing Controversy: A Debated Structure
The Ledger Multisig application applies a two-tier billing model: a fixed fee of $10 per transaction, supplemented by an additional 0.05% fee on token transfers. These costs are added to the usual blockchain network fees, significantly increasing the final bill for users. This pricing approach sharply contrasts with the initial promises made by the French giant, creating palpable frustration within the community.
Critical Voices Rise
Renowned Ethereum ecosystem developer, pcaversaccio, did not hold back, calling this strategy a “racket,” and arguing that it diverts users from the decentralized and sovereign principles that underpin the cypherpunk philosophy. This criticism carries particular weight because it comes from a technically respected figure, amplifying discomfort around this commercial decision.
The embarrassment was compounded by contradictory statements from CEO Charles Guillemet, who initially claimed that the multisig service would be free. When asked about this discrepancy, he later attributed the confusing communication to a simple textual error. This communication blunder fueled suspicions about Ledger’s true transparency.
Ledger Maintains Its Dominance Despite Controversy
Despite this reputation turmoil, Ledger remains a key player in the crypto hardware storage solutions market. With over 7.5 million devices sold, the company secures about one-fifth of the global digital asset value. This market dominance gives Ledger considerable decision-making power, although the recent controversy reveals the limits of its popularity.
The Double Challenge: Convenience and Security
Ledger hardware wallets offer exceptional protection against conventional attack vectors, but cybersecurity experts remind that the multisignature interface does not completely eliminate threats. Targeted phishing and social engineering techniques can still compromise the multi-signature chain, even on the most fortified devices.
This controversy surrounding Ledger Multisig illustrates the tension between technological innovation and commercial sustainability, forcing the crypto community to question the true cost of decentralized security.