2026-01-13 07:25:20

A recent technical development has made progress. A team deeply involved in post-quantum cryptography released an updated project homepage last night, changing their previous planning pace.

In the past, quantum cryptography was generally seen as something "needed in the future." Now, their approach has clearly shifted—treating it as a current infrastructure. The specific plan is a quantum-ready blockchain, focusing on achieving no hard forks, unchanged addresses, and smooth migration, while supporting hybrid signature mechanisms and a unified quantum-ready identity system across chains.

From a technical perspective, this forward-looking security design approach is indeed interesting. It is worth continuing to observe the subsequent implementation progress, especially looking forward to their disclosure of funding details and specific development roadmap.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Ser_Liquidated

· 15h ago

This shift in thinking is quite interesting, changing from "future matters" to "doing now," but how is this achieved without a hard fork?

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 15h ago

I have to mark this point about not needing a hard fork. If it can truly achieve a smooth transition, that would be amazing. It's much more reliable than those boastful claims of quantum security.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-15 20:22

Wow, avoiding hard forks is indeed a good point, but honestly, it all depends on whether they can actually deliver in the future. Quantum cryptography should have been on the agenda a long time ago. Instead of waiting to be cracked, it's better to start laying the groundwork now. When will the funding information be released? That's the real indicator of how serious they are.

View OriginalReply0

ContractTester

· 01-13 07:55

No hard fork, yet smooth migration—this approach is indeed unusual. Quantum cryptography has shifted from "armchair theory" to real infrastructure; finally, someone is taking it seriously. The address remains unchanged and is quantum-ready; I want to know how the technical details are implemented. When will the funding roadmap be disclosed? It feels like that's the real focus.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHomeless

· 01-13 07:54

If smooth migration can truly be implemented, it's indeed no small feat. But is the quantum threat really so imminent, or is it just another hype...

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 01-13 07:53

Huh? No hard fork needed for a smooth migration? I find that a bit hard to understand. Is the quantum threat really so imminent, or is it just another hype? Let's wait for the funding data to come out. The funding scale of such teams can reveal a lot. Honestly, hybrid signature mechanisms sound a bit complicated. Could they increase user experience costs? How is the security of the cross-chain unified identity system guaranteed? I have some doubts. It's really hard to judge before seeing a detailed development roadmap.

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 01-13 07:49

ngl the whole "quantum-ready without hard forks" thing sounds nice on paper but like... where's the actual data on adoption friction? technically speaking if you're doing hybrid sigs you're still adding compute overhead somewhere, nobody talks about that

Reply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-13 07:45

Oh wow, it's really happening now. Quantum cryptography has moved from theoretical discussions to becoming infrastructure. A smooth transition without hard forks sounds good, but can the hybrid signature mechanism really support the existing ecosystem? I've long thought that quantum threats shouldn't be delayed any longer. Finally, a team is no longer just talking about it on paper. When will the roadmap be released? Just changing the homepage isn't enough to excite the community. If this is truly going to be implemented, it will definitely shake up the market!

View OriginalReply0

NFTFreezer

· 01-13 07:43

No hard fork, just migration? That idea is a bit wild, can it really be implemented? --- Quantum threats haven't fully arrived yet, jumping into this now might be a bit rushed. --- If hybrid signatures are well supported, it could really address a market pain point. --- Wait, can it truly keep addresses unchanged and be quantum-ready? Details make all the difference. --- I'm quite interested in proactive security design, just worried it might be another PPT project. --- Changing the mindset from "future matter" to "doing it now" shows the team’s increased awareness of quantum threats. --- Cross-chain quantum identity system sounds a bit ahead of its time, but it might just be the next narrative point.

View OriginalReply0