Recently paid attention to the changes in the PvP market on the BSC chain, and I feel that the landscape has indeed changed hands.
Looking at the performance of several addresses, the data is quite eye-opening: projects with a market cap of 70,000 can be invested with 30,000 USDT, and even projects with less than 1 million in volume can generate returns of 40,000-50,000 USDT. The successful cases of these addresses are mostly from the recent round of small-cap projects.
Envious as I am, I took a closer look at the top-ranking addresses' holdings structure. A single address accounts for 40% of the project's circulating supply, showing a high level of concentration. Thinking further about their subsequent cash-out pressure and the potential liquidity shocks they might face...
Forget it, I’d better withdraw from the PvP market honestly. The risk and reward balance is now clearly out of whack.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FloorSweeper
· 8h ago
It seems this round of market activity has once again caught some people off guard. But to be fair, having 40% of the circulating supply concentrated in a single address is indeed a bit risky.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 01-13 20:31
Looking at the holding proportions of those addresses, it's really a bit scary.
A single address holding 40% of the circulating supply—how would they exit, and it will definitely cause a dump later.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 01-13 19:59
40% concentration, who dares to touch this? A quick cash-out would directly hit the limit down.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-13 07:08
Damn, how outrageous is this concentration? 40% by a single address? That's just a ticking time bomb.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 01-13 07:07
Looking at this level of concentration, still daring to go all in—our perspectives are indeed different.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 01-13 07:04
This concentration clearly looks like a trap. Who dares to take over?
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 01-13 06:52
Looking at this data, it’s upsetting. 40% of the circulating supply is in one address, this is a ticking time bomb, right?
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 01-13 06:44
40% of the circulating supply concentration—how uncomfortable that must be. When the time comes to dump, it will be quite a spectacle.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholar
· 01-13 06:43
Ha, one person holding 40% of the circulating supply is playing with fire; a dump is inevitable sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 01-13 06:41
Looking at these data, it's indeed a bit tempting, but with 40% of the circulating supply concentrated in one address, who can handle the pressure?
Recently paid attention to the changes in the PvP market on the BSC chain, and I feel that the landscape has indeed changed hands.
Looking at the performance of several addresses, the data is quite eye-opening: projects with a market cap of 70,000 can be invested with 30,000 USDT, and even projects with less than 1 million in volume can generate returns of 40,000-50,000 USDT. The successful cases of these addresses are mostly from the recent round of small-cap projects.
Envious as I am, I took a closer look at the top-ranking addresses' holdings structure. A single address accounts for 40% of the project's circulating supply, showing a high level of concentration. Thinking further about their subsequent cash-out pressure and the potential liquidity shocks they might face...
Forget it, I’d better withdraw from the PvP market honestly. The risk and reward balance is now clearly out of whack.