2026-01-13 06:28:41

Senator Lummis from the United States confirmed that the bipartisan "Digital Asset Market Transparency Act" has completed its text drafting and will be submitted to the Senate for review on Thursday.

The biggest highlight of this bill is the clear delineation of regulatory responsibilities—SEC is responsible for digital securities, CFTC for digital commodities, and it also provides registration exemptions for certain DeFi activities. This clear regulatory framework has given many industry insiders hope for a turnaround. Lummis emphasized in a statement that the bipartisan consensus was hard-won and hopes that Democratic colleagues will cherish this progress and work together to advance it.

It is worth noting that the House of Representatives has already completed the vote, and the current key is the Senate. Once passed, the US crypto industry will officially bid farewell to a long period of regulatory ambiguity. However, some market participants also remind that policy clarity itself is neutral; the true market reaction depends on whether the bill's content can balance innovation and investor protection.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeNightmare

· 9h ago

It's another round of regulation and bipartisan consensus; just listen and don't take it seriously.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 01-13 06:58

The medical record shows that the clinical performance of this bill is indeed good—SEC/CFTC responsibilities are clearly defined, effectively diagnosing the long-term issues. But the key question is, how well is the DeFi exemption section written? If the provisions are vague, it’s almost the same as no change. It is recommended that the Senate periodically review these details during the deliberation process.

View OriginalReply0

SocialFiQueen

· 01-13 06:58

Finally coming, huh? It's quite rare for the two parties to unite on this matter. If the regulatory framework becomes clear, will the crypto world have a better day? --- But to be honest, clear policies don't necessarily mean friendliness towards us. It still depends on how the provisions are written—don't get too excited too early. --- I'm paying attention to the DeFi exemption. That's truly the key to driving innovation; everything else is just superficial. --- If the Senate passes this hurdle, it's a win, but it still feels uncertain... The bipartisan consensus can't be fully trusted. --- Americans are finally giving a clear signal, which is better than everything hanging in the air. At least we won't have to worry about sudden policy changes every day. --- Wait, could this bill end up imposing shackles on innovation? I need to look at the details.

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 01-13 06:58

Wait, is the DeFi exemption real... If it really passes the Senate, we might be taking off.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 01-13 06:46

Wait, can the DeFi exemption really be implemented? Feels like just a pie in the sky. It's quite rare for both parties to reach a consensus, but it only counts if it actually passes the Senate. A clear regulatory framework ≠ advantageous for us; it depends on how the detailed provisions are written. Another "historic moment," this term in the crypto world is overused... Honestly, it's too early to talk about market reactions now; we have to wait until the bill actually takes effect to know. Why does it feel like every time it's "this time is different," but then it ends up being the same? Lummis is still reliable, but the folks in the Senate might not buy it.

View OriginalReply0

MeltdownSurvivalist

· 01-13 06:42

Finally, there is a somewhat clear framework, but whether it can be implemented depends on how the Senate votes... It's quite difficult for both parties to reach an agreement.

View OriginalReply0